Title
BBB255466 vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 255466
Decision Date
Nov 27, 2024
Petitioner BBB255466 was found guilty of psychological violence against his common-law partner and acts of lasciviousness against his daughter. The court affirmed the decisions of the lower courts with modified penalties.

Case Digest (A.C. No. 9081)
Expanded Legal Reasoning Model

Facts:

  • Parties and Charges
    • Petitioner BBB255466 (hereafter "petitioner") filed a Petition for Review on Certiorari contesting the Decisions of the Court of Appeals (CA) and Regional Trial Court (RTC) concerning two criminal cases.
    • Criminal Case No. 12-CR-8989 charged petitioner with psychological violence against his common-law partner, CCC, in violation of Section 5(i) of Republic Act (RA) No. 9262.
    • Criminal Case No. 12-CR-8990 charged petitioner with acts of lasciviousness against his daughter, AAA, a minor aged seven years at the time, under Article 336 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC) in relation to Section 5(b) of RA No. 7610.
  • Relationship and Background
    • Petitioner and CCC had been common-law partners since 2003 and had one child, AAA, born in 2005.
    • CCC testified to repeated physical and verbal abuse by petitioner, including throwing an LPG tank, slapping, chasing her with a bolo, and threatening to kill her.
    • CCC left petitioner in 2010 due to abuse and lived in Benguet with their daughter.
  • Abuse Against CCC (Psychological Violence)
    • Petitioner continuously harassed CCC at her boarding house, forcibly entering and verbally abusing her.
    • Petitioner asked for money and tried to reconcile, but also threatened CCC.
    • CCC's testimony described a persistent pattern of physical and verbal abuse causing mental and emotional anguish, fear, and trauma.
  • Abuse Against AAA (Acts of Lasciviousness)
    • AAA recounted that petitioner sexually abused her from the age of seven by making her hold his penis and touching her vagina, mostly when petitioner was drunk.
    • Medical examination showed physical injuries consistent with abuse.
  • Trial and Lower Court Decisions
    • Petitioner pleaded not guilty and did not present defense evidence.
    • The RTC found petitioner guilty of both charges, imposing appropriate penalties, fines, and ordering psychological counseling.
    • The CA affirmed the convictions with modifications to penalties and damages.
    • Petitioner moved to reconsider the CA decision, which the CA denied.
  • Petitioner's Arguments
    • Petitioner argued insufficient proof of mental or emotional anguish against CCC.
    • Petitioner also contested the elements of RA 7610 violation, especially the age of AAA and the proof of sexual abuse.
  • Government's Position
    • The Office of the Solicitor General opposed the petition, asserting that factual findings were supported by evidence and properly upheld.

Issues:

  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming petitioner’s conviction for psychological violence against CCC under Section 5(i) of RA No. 9262.
  • Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming petitioner’s conviction for acts of lasciviousness against AAA under Article 336 of the Revised Penal Code in relation to Section 5(b) of RA No. 7610.

Ruling:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Ratio:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Doctrine:

  • (Subscriber-Only)

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur helps you analyze cases smarter to comprehend faster—building context before diving into full texts.