Title
People vs Capillo
Case
G.R. No. 9279
Decision Date
Mar 25, 1915
Defendants accused of exposing a legitimate child to lose civil status by delivering him to another for payment; court ruled act did not meet statutory definition of "exposure" under Article 468.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. 9279)

Definition of "Exponer" and "Expusiere"

  • The verb "exponer," when referring to a newborn or young child, signifies abandonment, such as leaving a baby at a church or public place due to the parents' inability to support it or their anonymity.
  • The term "expusiere" in Article 468 of the Penal Code is interpreted in this context, indicating a similar meaning of abandonment.

Procedural Background

  • The United States appealed a decision from the Court of First Instance of Manila, which dismissed the case based on a motion from the defendants that functioned as a demurrer.
  • The information accused Saturnino Capillo and Petrona Paduga of exposing their legitimate child to lose his civil status, detailing actions taken by the defendants to transfer the child to another party without the mother's consent.

Defendants' Motion and Court's Ruling

  • The defendants filed a motion arguing that the information did not present sufficient facts to constitute a crime, asserting that the actions described did not align with the definitions in the Penal Code.
  • The court accepted the motion as a demurrer, ultimately ruling that the complaint lacked sufficient facts to establish the crime charged, leading to the dismissal of the case.

Interpretation of Article 468 of the Penal Code

  • Article 468 penalizes the concealment or abandonment of a legitimate child with the intent to cause the child to lose its civil status.
  • The prosecution's argument hinged on the interpretation of "expusiere," suggesting it included actions that risked the child's civil status, but the court found this interpretation unsupported by the language of the statute.

Grammatical and Lexical Analysis

  • The court analyzed the grammatical structure of the relevant terms, emphasizing that "expusiere" and "ocultare" are transitive verbs that require a direct object, which in this case is "child."
  • The court concluded that the term "exponer" must be understood in the context of abandonment, as indicated by historical usage and definitions in Spanish legal literature.

Examination of Intent and Context

  • The court noted that the intent behind the act of exposing a child must be clear and that the information did not sufficiently allege abandonment as defined by the law.
  • The prosecution's aim appeared to be penalizing the father's actions in transferring the child, but the court clarified that such conduct...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.