Case Summary (G.R. No. L-32797)
Background of the Case
- Petitioner Pio L. Tolentino seeks to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals dated August 24, 1970.
- Tolentino served in the Antipolo police force since 1934, becoming sergeant in 1939 and Chief of Police in 1958.
- His appointment as Chief of Police was initially temporary, pending a medical certificate, and later approved as permanent, subject to examination.
- Tolentino passed a civil service examination for municipal chief of police in 1963, with results released in January 1964.
- Despite the Commissioner of Civil Service recommending his reinstatement after his dismissal, the respondent Mayor appointed another individual to the position.
Evidence Presented by Respondents
- The Mayor presented evidence including a second indorsement from the Commissioner of Civil Service regarding the appointment of Jose Oliveros, who claimed salary for the period following Tolentino's dismissal.
- The Commissioner stated that Tolentino's dismissal was legal due to his temporary appointment status.
- A letter from the Commissioner to Tolentino indicated that his examination eligibility was canceled due to failure to disclose a prior criminal case, which could have disqualified him.
Legal Status of Petitioner’s Appointments
- Tolentino's appointments were scrutinized, revealing that his initial appointment was temporary and not a permanent civil service position.
- The legal implications of temporary appointments were discussed, indicating that such positions do not afford the same security of tenure as permanent appointments.
- The acceptance of a temporary appointment divests the appointee of constitutional protections against removal without cause.
Findings of the Court of Appeals
- The Court of Appeals found that Tolentino had no civil service eligibility until he passed the chief of police examination, which was after his dismissal.
- The Court affirmed that the Mayor's termination of Tolentino's services was legal and based on the lack of requisite civil service eligibility.
- The findings of the Court of Appeals were deemed conclusive and not subject to dispute by Tolentino.
Cancellation of Civil Service Eligibility
- The Commissioner of Civil Service canceled Tolentino's eligibility due to his failure to disclose a criminal case...continue reading