Title
Tolentino vs. De Jesus
Case
G.R. No. L-32797
Decision Date
Mar 27, 1974
Pio Tolentino, dismissed as Chief of Police due to lack of eligibility, concealed criminal case, and contempt conviction; SC upheld dismissal, citing temporary appointment, eligibility cancellation, and moral unfitness.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-32797)

Background of the Case

  • Petitioner Pio L. Tolentino seeks to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals dated August 24, 1970.
  • Tolentino served in the Antipolo police force since 1934, becoming sergeant in 1939 and Chief of Police in 1958.
  • His appointment as Chief of Police was initially temporary, pending a medical certificate, and later approved as permanent, subject to examination.
  • Tolentino passed a civil service examination for municipal chief of police in 1963, with results released in January 1964.
  • Despite the Commissioner of Civil Service recommending his reinstatement after his dismissal, the respondent Mayor appointed another individual to the position.

Evidence Presented by Respondents

  • The Mayor presented evidence including a second indorsement from the Commissioner of Civil Service regarding the appointment of Jose Oliveros, who claimed salary for the period following Tolentino's dismissal.
  • The Commissioner stated that Tolentino's dismissal was legal due to his temporary appointment status.
  • A letter from the Commissioner to Tolentino indicated that his examination eligibility was canceled due to failure to disclose a prior criminal case, which could have disqualified him.

Legal Status of Petitioner’s Appointments

  • Tolentino's appointments were scrutinized, revealing that his initial appointment was temporary and not a permanent civil service position.
  • The legal implications of temporary appointments were discussed, indicating that such positions do not afford the same security of tenure as permanent appointments.
  • The acceptance of a temporary appointment divests the appointee of constitutional protections against removal without cause.

Findings of the Court of Appeals

  • The Court of Appeals found that Tolentino had no civil service eligibility until he passed the chief of police examination, which was after his dismissal.
  • The Court affirmed that the Mayor's termination of Tolentino's services was legal and based on the lack of requisite civil service eligibility.
  • The findings of the Court of Appeals were deemed conclusive and not subject to dispute by Tolentino.

Cancellation of Civil Service Eligibility

  • The Commissioner of Civil Service canceled Tolentino's eligibility due to his failure to disclose a criminal case...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.