Title
People vs. Baderes y Mapisa
Case
G.R. No. L-38413
Decision Date
Aug 27, 1987
A 13-year-old alleged rape by Crisanto Baderes; Supreme Court acquitted due to insufficient evidence, citing inconsistent testimony and lack of corroboration.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-38413)

Appeal Overview

  • The case involves an appeal by Crisanto Baderes y Mapisa against a conviction for rape.
  • The original decision sentenced him to reclusion perpetua and ordered him to pay damages to the victim, Irene Aonuevo.
  • The appeal centers on the credibility of the victim's testimony, which Baderes contests, claiming the encounter was consensual.

Prosecution's Evidence

  • The prosecution presented Irene Aonuevo, a 13-year-old, who testified about being attacked after a passion play.
  • She reported being threatened with a sharp object by Baderes, who then took her to a house where he and three accomplices assaulted her.
  • Medical examination findings indicated physical trauma consistent with sexual intercourse, although no extragenital injuries were noted.

Defense's Evidence

  • Baderes claimed that he and Irene were in a consensual relationship and that she asked him to take her home.
  • He testified that they spent time together in a secluded area and engaged in consensual sexual activity.
  • The defense presented witnesses who corroborated Baderes's account of the events leading to their encounter.

Trial Court's Findings

  • The trial court found the prosecution's evidence credible, citing the consistency of Irene's testimony and the medical findings.
  • The court dismissed the defense's claims, asserting that there was no motive for Irene to fabricate her story.

Scrutiny of Medical Findings

  • The appellate court examined the medical findings, noting that while there were hymenal lacerations, they did not definitively indicate rape.
  • The absence of extragenital injuries and the victim's coherent state post-incident raised doubts about the prosecution's claims.

Credibility of the Victim's Testimony

  • The appellate court questioned the plausibility of Irene's actions following the alleged assault, including her decision to walk home alone at night.
  • The court found inconsistencies in her statements, particularly regarding the circumstances of her encounter with Baderes.

Defense Witness Testimonies

  • The defense presented testimonies from friends of both Baderes and Irene, which supported the claim of consensual relations.
  • Evelyn Alcantara, a close friend of Irene, testified that Irene had expressed affection for Baderes and did not indicate that she had been raped.

Conclusion on Evidence

  • The...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.