Title
Manila Publishing Co. vs. Bernabe
Case
G.R. No. 31067
Decision Date
Sep 14, 1929
Plaintiff appealed judgment 17 days after entry; Court dismissed appeal, ruling 15-day period starts at judgment entry, not notification. Attorneys criticized for negligence.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. 31067)

Case Background and Parties Involved

  • The plaintiff is Manila Publishing Company, a domestic corporation based in Manila.
  • The defendants include Jose Bernabe, the Judge of the Municipal Court of Manila; Yap Sulan, a resident; and Jose Casimiro, the Sheriff of the City of Manila.
  • The case originated from a trial involving Yap Sulan against Manila Publishing Company and the Sheriff, which took place on December 5, 1927.
  • The judge reserved his decision after the trial, rendering it on December 12, 1927, with the plaintiff receiving notice of the judgment on December 20, 1927.

Appeal Process and Timeliness

  • The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on December 29, 1927, which was nine days after receiving notice of the judgment and seventeen days after the judgment was rendered.
  • Yap Sulan filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, arguing it was not perfected within the legally prescribed time.
  • The municipal judge dismissed the appeal on February 2, 1928, leading the plaintiff to seek a preliminary injunction against the execution of the judgment.

Legal Arguments and Court Proceedings

  • The plaintiff's petition was met with a demurrer from the defendants, claiming insufficient facts to constitute a cause of action.
  • The lower court overruled the demurrer on March 31, 1928, and set a hearing for May 21, 1928, where it ultimately ruled against the plaintiff and dissolved the injunction.
  • The plaintiff appealed, assigning errors related to the reversal of the previous decision and the claim that the appeal was not perfected in time.

Legal Interpretation of Appeal Timeliness

  • The court analyzed the relevant sections of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the timing of appeals.
  • It was established that the judgment must be appealed within fifteen days from the date of its entry, not from the date of notification.
  • The court referenced a previous case, Agcaoili vs. Rivera, affirming that the fifteen-day period for appeal begins from the entry of judgment.

Attorney's Duty and Responsibility

  • The court emphasized the responsibility of attorneys to actively protect their clients' interests and not rely solely on court clerks for information regarding judgments.
  • The attorneys in this ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.