Case Summary (G.R. No. 536)
Sovereignty and Admission of Foreigners
- The State has the inherent right to restrict the admission of foreigners to preserve its integrity and sovereignty.
- This right is not diminished by existing treaties of commerce and intercourse between nations.
- The authority to exercise this right is vested in the executive branch of the government, free from judicial interference.
Executive Discretion and Judicial Review
- An executive officer authorized by statute to exclude foreigners based on reasonable grounds is the sole judge of the facts surrounding that decision.
- Courts cannot require the executive officer to justify the reasonable grounds for their belief in a judicial setting.
- The jurisdiction of the officer remains intact even if a foreigner prohibited from landing has actually landed.
Surreptitious Landing and Detention Rights
- If a foreigner lands without proper authorization or knowledge of the relevant authorities, the right of those authorities to detain the individual continues for a reasonable time.
- The law does not extend the power to arrest and detain individuals after a lawful landing has occurred.
Legislative Authority and Immigration Regulations
- Act 265 is not an emigration law, as it does not regulate the conditions under which inhabitants may leave the territory.
- It is also not an immigration law, as it applies to individuals regardless of nationality who may have certain unlawful intentions.
- The law specifically aims to prevent the entry of individuals who have engaged in or supported insurrection against the United States or its established government.
International Treaties and State Rights
- The existence of international treaties does not obligate a State to admit foreigners under all circumstances.
- States retain the right to establish conditions for the entry of foreigners, which is a legitimate exercise of territorial power.
- The right to expel foreigners who do not comply with local laws is also recognized.
Executive Power and Public Safety
- The executive branch has the authority to take necessary precautions to ensure public safety concerning foreigners.
- The expulsion of foreigners is considered a political measure, and the executive can act without judicial appeal if their presence threatens public peace.
Reasonable Grounds and Judicial Oversight
- The law's requirement for "reasonable grounds" does not imply that the executive officer must present evidence of these grounds in court.
- The executive officer is expected to act with discretion, honesty, and prudence in exercising their powers.
Case Background and Legal Proceedings
- Thomas Toye Patterson, a British subject, was arrested by the Collector of Customs after arriving in Manila and refusing to take an oath required by Act 265.
- The court allowed extensive discussion and evidence to be presented regarding the law's application and the authority of the Collector.
Legislative Commission's Authority
- The court affirmed the Legislative Commission's authority to enact laws concerning immigration and the exclusion of foreigners.
- The law's existence is justified as it serves the welfare of the people and does not infringe upon any r...continue reading