Title
IN RE: Patterson
Case
G.R. No. 536
Decision Date
Jan 23, 1902
A British official, Thomas Patterson, was detained in Manila under Act 265, a U.S. law targeting suspected insurrectionists. The court upheld his detention, ruling the Collector of Customs had discretionary authority to expel foreigners threatening public safety, affirming state self-preservation rights.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. 536)

Sovereignty and Admission of Foreigners

  • The State has the inherent right to restrict the admission of foreigners to preserve its integrity and sovereignty.
  • This right is not diminished by existing treaties of commerce and intercourse between nations.
  • The authority to exercise this right is vested in the executive branch of the government, free from judicial interference.

Executive Discretion and Judicial Review

  • An executive officer authorized by statute to exclude foreigners based on reasonable grounds is the sole judge of the facts surrounding that decision.
  • Courts cannot require the executive officer to justify the reasonable grounds for their belief in a judicial setting.
  • The jurisdiction of the officer remains intact even if a foreigner prohibited from landing has actually landed.

Surreptitious Landing and Detention Rights

  • If a foreigner lands without proper authorization or knowledge of the relevant authorities, the right of those authorities to detain the individual continues for a reasonable time.
  • The law does not extend the power to arrest and detain individuals after a lawful landing has occurred.

Legislative Authority and Immigration Regulations

  • Act 265 is not an emigration law, as it does not regulate the conditions under which inhabitants may leave the territory.
  • It is also not an immigration law, as it applies to individuals regardless of nationality who may have certain unlawful intentions.
  • The law specifically aims to prevent the entry of individuals who have engaged in or supported insurrection against the United States or its established government.

International Treaties and State Rights

  • The existence of international treaties does not obligate a State to admit foreigners under all circumstances.
  • States retain the right to establish conditions for the entry of foreigners, which is a legitimate exercise of territorial power.
  • The right to expel foreigners who do not comply with local laws is also recognized.

Executive Power and Public Safety

  • The executive branch has the authority to take necessary precautions to ensure public safety concerning foreigners.
  • The expulsion of foreigners is considered a political measure, and the executive can act without judicial appeal if their presence threatens public peace.

Reasonable Grounds and Judicial Oversight

  • The law's requirement for "reasonable grounds" does not imply that the executive officer must present evidence of these grounds in court.
  • The executive officer is expected to act with discretion, honesty, and prudence in exercising their powers.

Case Background and Legal Proceedings

  • Thomas Toye Patterson, a British subject, was arrested by the Collector of Customs after arriving in Manila and refusing to take an oath required by Act 265.
  • The court allowed extensive discussion and evidence to be presented regarding the law's application and the authority of the Collector.

Legislative Commission's Authority

  • The court affirmed the Legislative Commission's authority to enact laws concerning immigration and the exclusion of foreigners.
  • The law's existence is justified as it serves the welfare of the people and does not infringe upon any r...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.