Title
Pueblo de Filipinas vs. Alfredo Neri
Case
G.R. No. L-271
Decision Date
Dec 3, 1946
A dispute over a small debt escalated into a fatal midnight confrontation, with Neri convicted of homicide after the court rejected his self-defense claim, citing his aggression and mitigating factors.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-271)

Background of the Case

  • Alfredo Neri was convicted of homicide by the Court of First Instance of Negros Occidental.
  • He was sentenced to an indeterminate prison term of 6 years and 1 day to 12 years, along with a P2,000 indemnity to the heirs of the deceased, Eugenio Bojeris.
  • The incident occurred on October 4, 1945, following a dispute over a debt of P2.50 owed by Neri to Bojeris.

Sequence of Events Leading to the Altercation

  • Enrica Soliman, the wife of Eugenio Bojeris, visited Neri to collect the debt, leading to a heated argument.
  • Neri expressed his frustration, stating he would retaliate if Bojeris were present.
  • Eugenio, upon hearing the confrontation, came to his wife's aid, armed with a stick, but a physical confrontation was initially avoided.

The Fatal Encounter

  • Later that night, Neri returned home after work and confronted Eugenio at his residence, challenging him to a fight.
  • Eugenio emerged with a lamp and a stick, leading to a physical altercation where Neri used a bolo to inflict injuries on Eugenio.
  • Despite attempts by bystanders to separate them, Eugenio sustained fatal injuries and died shortly after at the hospital.

Defense Argument

  • Neri claimed he acted in self-defense, asserting that he was attacked first by Eugenio with the lamp.
  • He presented medical evidence of his own injuries to support his claim of having defended himself against Eugenio's aggression.

Evaluation of Credibility

  • The court found Neri's self-defense claim implausible, questioning why Eugenio would confront him at night with a lamp if he intended to ambush him.
  • Testimonies from witnesses, including Enrica and Felix Ibanez, contradicted Neri's version, indicating that he initiated the confrontation.

Analysis of Provocation and Responsibility

  • The court determined that Neri was the provocateur, as he challenged Eugenio to a fight, which led to the fatal encounter.
  • The court noted that even if Eugenio had a violent temperament, it did not absolve Neri of responsibility for the resulting homicide.

Sentencing Considerations

  • The court acknowledged the aggravating circumstance of the nighttime confrontation but also recognized mitigating factors, such as Neri's lack of intent to cause severe harm and his state of intoxication.
  • Ultimately, the court imposed a reduced sentence of 6 ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.