Title
Domestic Insurance Company of the Philippines vs. Barber Line
Case
G.R. No. L-23879
Decision Date
Nov 18, 1967
Cargo loss claim against the Republic of the Philippines dismissed due to state immunity; arrastre service deemed a governmental function.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-23879)

Nature of Arrastre Service and Government Immunity

  • The arrastre service is operated by the Republic of the Philippines through the Bureau of Customs.
  • This operation is considered a fundamental governmental function related to the assessment and collection of revenues, tariffs, customs duties, and fees from importations.
  • As a sovereign entity, the Republic of the Philippines enjoys immunity from being sued without its explicit consent.

Case Background and Allegations

  • The Domestic Insurance Company of the Philippines, acting as the insurer-subrogee of cargo, filed a suit for monetary compensation against Barber Line, Macondray & Co., Inc., and the Republic of the Philippines.
  • The suit arose from the nondelivery of certain cargo items to the consignee, Centennial Commercial Corporation.
  • The cargo, which included three cartons of shears, was shipped from New York and arrived in Manila on June 24, 1963.
  • Upon arrival, the cargo was discharged into the custody of the arrastre operator, and the consignee completed all necessary shipping documentation.
  • The plaintiff alleged that due to the negligence of the defendants, losses amounting to P8,800.92 were incurred due to undelivered items.

Court Proceedings and Dismissal

  • The Republic of the Philippines filed a motion to dismiss the case against it, citing sovereign immunity.
  • The lower court granted this motion, dismissing the case against the Republic on the grounds that the State cannot be sued without its consent.
  • The Domestic Insurance Company subsequently appealed the dismissal.

Affirmation of Dismissal

  • The appellate court upheld the ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.