Title
De la Cerna vs. Osmena, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. L-12492
Decision Date
May 23, 1959
Civil service employee suspended, position abolished; petition for reinstatement and back salaries filed three years later, barred by one-year prescriptive period under *Unabia* doctrine.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-12492)

Background of the Case

  • Petitioner Andres de la Cerna was appointed as a detective in the Cebu City police department on July 1, 1946.
  • He faced administrative charges for "grave misconduct, serious irregularity in the performance of his duty, and violation of law and duty."
  • De la Cerna was suspended on June 7, 1953, pending the outcome of the charges against him.
  • After the 60-day suspension period, he requested reinstatement on August 7, 1953, citing Republic Act No. 557.
  • On October 10, 1953, he was informed that his position had been abolished in the 1953-1954 General Fund Budget, leading to the termination of his services.

Initiation of Legal Proceedings

  • On May 5, 1956, de la Cerna filed a petition for mandamus in the Court of First Instance of Cebu.
  • The petition sought to compel the City Mayor, municipal board members, city treasurer, and city auditor to reinstate him and pay his back salary.
  • The respondents filed an answer and subsequently a motion to dismiss the petition.

Trial Court's Ruling

  • The trial court dismissed the petition on September 11, 1956, referencing the precedent set in Severino Unabia vs. the City Mayor of Cebu.
  • A motion for reconsideration was filed but was denied by the trial court on January 28, 1957.
  • Both orders of dismissal were appealed to a higher court.

Controversy Over Administrative Case

  • De la Cerna claimed that the administrative case against him was still pending investigation.
  • Respondents contended that he had been found guilty and dismissed from service.
  • The court noted a lack of evidence to resolve this conflicting information.

Legal Principles and Conclusion

  • The court acknowledged that de la Cerna's position was abolished, and he was separated from service on October 10, 1953.
  • He filed for reinstat...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.