Title
City of Manila vs. Gambe
Case
G.R. No. 1922
Decision Date
Mar 31, 1906
Pilot Francisco Gambe held solely liable for bridge damage caused by incorrect orders; lack of communication equipment deemed irrelevant to accident causation.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. 1922)

Liability of the Pilot for Ship Accidents

  • The pilot in command of a vessel is held responsible for accidents resulting from their mistakes, rather than the vessel's owners.
  • In this case, Francisco Gambe, the pilot of the steamer Alfred, was found to have made a critical error in navigation.
  • The pilot's failure to issue the correct orders directly led to the accident, establishing his liability for the damages incurred.

Evidence and Findings of the Trial Court

  • The trial court's findings were supported by the weight of the evidence, despite conflicting testimonies.
  • The court accepted the facts as presented, concluding that the pilot's actions were the sole cause of the accident.
  • The argument that the vessel's owners should be liable due to inadequate equipment was dismissed, as the lack of a speaking tube did not contribute to the pilot's error.

Assessment of Damages

  • The defense argued that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate the actual damages to the bridge.
  • However, the testimonies of Major Case, the city engineer, and A. W. Ayres, the port inspector, were deemed conclusive regarding the damages.
  • The absence of rebuttal evidence from the defense reinforced the trial court's findings on the extent of the damages.

Conclusion and Judgment

  • The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, holding the pilot accountable for the accident and the resulting damages.
  • Costs were ordered against the appella...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.