Case Summary (G.R. No. 159624)
Case Overview
- The case involves a petition for review by Cebu Mactan Members Center, Inc. (CMMCI) against Masahiro Tsukahara.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the Regional Trial Court's (RTC) decision regarding the liability of CMMCI for loans obtained by its president.
Antecedent Facts
- In February 1994, CMMCI, represented by its president Mitsumasa Sugimoto, borrowed P6,500,000 from Tsukahara, issuing seven postdated checks as payment.
- On April 13, 1994, CMMCI secured an additional loan of P10,000,000 from Tsukahara, with Sugimoto signing a promissory note in both his corporate and personal capacity.
- The loans were allegedly used for improvements to CMMCI's beach resort.
- Tsukahara's attempts to collect the loan payments were unsuccessful, leading to the filing of a case for collection against CMMCI and Sugimoto.
RTC Decision
- The RTC ruled in favor of Tsukahara, ordering CMMCI and Sugimoto to pay the total loan amounts, including interest and attorney's fees.
- Sugimoto was declared in default due to being served summons by publication.
Court of Appeals Ruling
- The Court of Appeals upheld the RTC's decision, dismissing CMMCI's appeal and affirming the lower court's ruling.
Legal Issue
- The primary issue was whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding CMMCI liable for the loans contracted by Sugimoto without a board resolution.
Court's Ruling
- The Supreme Court found the petition without merit, emphasizing that a corporation acts through its board of directors, which holds the authority to bind the corporation.
- Section 23 of the Corporation Code stipulates that corporate powers are exercised by the board, but the board may delegate authority to officers.
Authority of Corporate Officers
- The ruling clarified that corporate officers can bind the corporation if they have been granted authority, either expressly or impliedly.
- The corporate by-laws of CMMCI explicitly granted the president the power to borrow money and execute contracts on behalf of the corporation.
Interpretation of Corporate By-Laws
- The Court noted t...continue reading