Title
Cebu Mactan Members Center, Inc. vs. Tsukahara
Case
G.R. No. 159624
Decision Date
Jul 17, 2009
CMMCI, through its President, obtained loans from Tsukahara, issuing checks and a promissory note. Despite dishonored checks, the Supreme Court upheld CMMCI's liability, citing the President's express authority under corporate by-laws, rendering a board resolution unnecessary.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. 159624)

Case Overview

  • The case involves a petition for review by Cebu Mactan Members Center, Inc. (CMMCI) against Masahiro Tsukahara.
  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the Regional Trial Court's (RTC) decision regarding the liability of CMMCI for loans obtained by its president.

Antecedent Facts

  • In February 1994, CMMCI, represented by its president Mitsumasa Sugimoto, borrowed P6,500,000 from Tsukahara, issuing seven postdated checks as payment.
  • On April 13, 1994, CMMCI secured an additional loan of P10,000,000 from Tsukahara, with Sugimoto signing a promissory note in both his corporate and personal capacity.
  • The loans were allegedly used for improvements to CMMCI's beach resort.
  • Tsukahara's attempts to collect the loan payments were unsuccessful, leading to the filing of a case for collection against CMMCI and Sugimoto.

RTC Decision

  • The RTC ruled in favor of Tsukahara, ordering CMMCI and Sugimoto to pay the total loan amounts, including interest and attorney's fees.
  • Sugimoto was declared in default due to being served summons by publication.

Court of Appeals Ruling

  • The Court of Appeals upheld the RTC's decision, dismissing CMMCI's appeal and affirming the lower court's ruling.

Legal Issue

  • The primary issue was whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding CMMCI liable for the loans contracted by Sugimoto without a board resolution.

Court's Ruling

  • The Supreme Court found the petition without merit, emphasizing that a corporation acts through its board of directors, which holds the authority to bind the corporation.
  • Section 23 of the Corporation Code stipulates that corporate powers are exercised by the board, but the board may delegate authority to officers.

Authority of Corporate Officers

  • The ruling clarified that corporate officers can bind the corporation if they have been granted authority, either expressly or impliedly.
  • The corporate by-laws of CMMCI explicitly granted the president the power to borrow money and execute contracts on behalf of the corporation.

Interpretation of Corporate By-Laws

  • The Court noted t...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.