Title
Buted vs. Herdo
Case
A.C. No. 1359
Decision Date
Oct 17, 1991
Atty. Hernando represented conflicting interests in property disputes, violating professional ethics by opposing former clients without consent, leading to a five-month suspension.
Font Size:

Case Summary (A.C. No. 1359)

Case Background

  • This case concerns an administrative complaint filed by Generosa Buted and Benito Bolisay against Atty. Harold M. Hernando for malpractice, due to alleged abuse of professional secrets.
  • The complaint was initiated on August 22, 1974, and involved complex estate and property ownership issues concerning Lot 9439-B.

Relevant Legal Proceedings

  • The complaint was referred to the Solicitor-General for investigation on October 4, 1974.
  • A Joint Affidavit of Desistance was filed by the complainants on February 10, 1975.
  • A hearing was conducted on October 24, 1975, where both parties presented their testimonies.

Conflict of Interest

  • Legal Principle: A lawyer is prohibited from representing conflicting interests without the express consent of all affected parties after full disclosure.

  • Key Definitions:

    • Conflict of Interest: A situation where a lawyer represents clients with opposing interests in related matters, compromising their duty to provide undivided loyalty.
  • Requirements:

    • Full disclosure of facts must be made to all clients.
    • Written consent from all clients is now mandated under the current Code of Professional Responsibility.
  • Key Details:

    • Respondent represented Luciana Abadilla and Angela Buted in a partition case regarding Lot 9439-B.
    • He later represented Benito Bolisay in a separate matter involving the same property, which led to conflicting interests.

Findings of the Solicitor-General

  • The Solicitor-General recommended a three-month suspension for Atty. Hernando for violating the Canons of Professional Ethics.
  • The determination of conflict arose from Hernando's simultaneous representation of opposing interests regarding Lot 9439-B.

Court's Decision

  • The Court found that Atty. Hernando was indeed in a conflict of interest situation, noting:
    • His actions in representing Bolisay and subsequently filing a cancellation petition against Bolisay's title constituted a breach of ethical obligations.
    • The Court cited precedents that emphasize the importance of maintaining client confidentiality and avoiding any appearance of impropriety.

Penalties Imposed

  • Atty. Harold M. Hernando was suspended from the practice of law for five (5) months.
  • The Court warned that any repetition of similar offenses would result in more severe penalties.

Key Takeaways

  • A lawyer must avoid conflicts of interest and maintain the confidentiality and loyalty owed to former and current clients.
  • The absence of monetary compensation does not exempt an attorney from th
...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research tool in the Philippines with case digests and full jurisprudence. AI summaries highlight key points but might skip important details or context. Always check the full text for accuracy.