Title
Bicol Savings and Loan Association vs. Guinhawa
Case
G.R. No. 62415
Decision Date
Aug 20, 1990
A solidary co-maker was held liable for a loan deficiency after chattel mortgage foreclosure, as the mortgage was security, not debt payment.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. 62415)

Case Background

This case involves a loan agreement between Bicol Savings and Loan Association (BISLA) and Victorio Depositario, with Jaime Guinhawa acting as a solidary co-maker. The loan of P10,622.00 was secured by a chattel mortgage on a Yamaha Motorcycle. Due to non-payment, the motorcycle was foreclosed, leaving a deficiency of P5,158.06. BISLA subsequently sued both Depositario and Guinhawa for the deficiency.

  • Loan Amount: P10,622.00
  • Monthly Payment: P535.45
  • Maturity Date: June 19, 1982
  • Deficiency Amount: P5,158.06 after foreclosure

Legal Issues

The core legal issue revolves around whether Guinhawa, as a solidary co-maker, is liable for the deficiency after the foreclosure of the chattel mortgage executed by Depositario.

  • Solidary Obligation: Guinhawa is solidarily liable for the debt alongside Depositario.
  • Foreclosure of Mortgage: The mortgage was foreclosed without notice to Guinhawa, raising questions about his liability for the deficiency.

Court Decisions

  1. City Court Ruling: The City Court ruled in favor of BISLA, holding that:

    • The obligation under the promissory note is joint and several.
    • The right to claim for the deficiency post-foreclosure is valid.
  2. Court of First Instance Ruling: The appellate court reversed the City Court's decision, stating:

    • By choosing to foreclose on the mortgage, BISLA could only collect from Depositario, not Guinhawa.
    • The deficiency cannot revert to Guinhawa since he was not a party to the mortgage.

Legal Principles

Solidary Liability

  • Definition: Solidary liability means that each co-debtor is liable for the entire obligation and the creditor may pursue any one or more of the co-debtors.
  • Civil Code Reference: Article 1216 allows the creditor to pursue any solidary debtor for the full amount.

Chattel Mortgage Foreclosure

  • Legal Principle: A chattel mortgage serves as security for a loan, and foreclosure allows the creditor to recover the owed amount through the property sold.
  • Rights of the Creditor: If a deficiency exists post-foreclosure, the creditor retains the right to pursue the remaining balance from any solidary debtor.

Cross-References to Other Laws

  • Civil Code of the Philippines: Articles 1216 (on solidary obligations) and 2047 (on suretyship) are crucial in determining the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

Key Takeaways

  • Guinhawa, as a solidary co-maker, is liable for the loan despite not being part of the mortgage agreement.
  • The foreclosure of the chattel mortgage does not absolve Guinhawa of liability for the deficiency; he can still be pursued for the unpaid balance.
  • The court confirmed that the creditor can choose which s

...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research tool in the Philippines with case digests and full jurisprudence. AI summaries highlight key points but might skip important details or context. Always check the full text for accuracy.