Title
Bayquen vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 93851
Decision Date
Mar 6, 1992
Two men charged with homicide after a 1984 killing in Baguio City; acquitted due to unreliable dying declaration, inconsistent evidence, and lack of motive.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. 93851)

Unexplained Delay in Dying Declaration

  • The Court disregarded the dying declaration of the deceased Buenaventura Mendoza in a similar case due to the widow's failure to disclose it to police investigators and a barangay councilman until trial.
  • The widow's explanation for the delay was deemed insufficient, leading to skepticism about the credibility of the dying declaration.

Credibility Issues in the Current Case

  • Bernadette Estepa's excuse for not revealing her brother Bong Estepa's dying declaration was fear due to being alone while her family was abroad.
  • The Court questioned why she did not report the incident to authorities after her family returned, suggesting that their presence could have provided her with the necessary support.
  • The inconsistency between Bong Estepa's statement of being "shot and stabbed" and the autopsy findings, which indicated he died from a single gunshot wound, further undermined the prosecution's case.

Trial Court's Findings and Appeals

  • The Regional Trial Court found both Mark Bayquen and Wilfredo Boco guilty of homicide, sentencing them to imprisonment and ordering them to pay damages to the victim's heirs.
  • Boco appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in crediting Bernadette Estepa's testimony and in admitting the deceased's declaration.
  • Bayquen also appealed, raising similar issues regarding the credibility of Bernadette's testimony and the lack of motive for the accused.

Court of Appeals Decision

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision, leading to Boco's motion for reconsideration, which was denied.
  • Bayquen filed a petition, claiming the appellate court failed to consider specific legal provisions and evidence.

Sequence of Events Leading to the Incident

  • On July 23, 1984, Teofilo Estepa returned home and dined with his sister Bernadette, expressing concern about being sought by others.
  • The following day, after a series of events, Teofilo was shot, and Bernadette discovered him bleeding and heard him name his assailants.

Testimony and Evidence Presented

  • Bernadette Estepa testified that her brother identified Mark Bayquen and Wilfredo Boco as his attackers before he died.
  • However, her statements made shortly after the incident did not name any assailants, raising questions about her credibility.

Analysis of Dying Declaration and Res Gestae

  • The Court emphasized the importance of spontaneous statements made immediately after the incident, which should be given more weight than later declarations.
  • The autopsy findings confirmed that Teofilo Estepa died from a gunshot wound, contradicting the claim of being stabbed.

Lack of Motive and Credibility of Accusations

  • The prosecution&...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.