Title
Babala vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. L-23065
Decision Date
Feb 16, 1970
Defendant's appeal dismissed due to counsel's failure to pay docket fee and receive court notices; Supreme Court upheld dismissal, citing counsel's negligence as inexcusable.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-23065)

Dismissal of Appeal for Non-Payment of Docket Fee

  • The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to pay the docket fee.
  • The dismissal was based on the appellant's counsel's failure to claim registered letters containing notices to pay the docket fee.
  • Two notices were sent to the counsel's office and received by responsible personnel at the Rural Bank of Daet, Inc., where the counsel's office was located.
  • The Court of Appeals did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the appeal.

Attorney's Duty to Ensure Receipt of Notices

  • An attorney must adopt a reliable system to ensure the prompt receipt of all judicial notices, especially when not permanently residing at their address of record.
  • This duty is essential for maintaining effective communication and representation of clients.

Inadequate Justification for Counsel's Negligence

  • Atty. Edmundo A. Narra, the counsel for the petitioner, admitted to not having a regular clerk in his office.
  • His claim of being "a small practitioner" was deemed unacceptable as an excuse for failing to receive the notices.
  • The presence of responsible personnel at the bank who received the notices undermined his assertion that the notices were not relayed to him.
  • The court found the counsel's negligence inexcusable.

Affirmation of Court of Appeals' Resolutions

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the resolutions of the Court of Appeals dismissing the appeal and denying motions for reconsideration.
  • The ruling emphasized the long-standing principle that attorneys must maintain a system for receiving court notices.
  • The case r...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.