Title
Alinsonorin vs. Canonoy
Case
G.R. No. L-16744
Decision Date
Mar 31, 1965
Husband sold conjugal properties to evade court-ordered payments to wife; judge enforced judgment by requiring deposit of sale proceeds.
Font Size:

Case Summary (G.R. No. L-16744)

Case Overview

  • Legal Action: Petition for certiorari with a prayer for a writ of preliminary injunction.
  • Petitioner: Simplicio Alinsolorin.
  • Respondents: Mateo M. Canonoy (Presiding Judge) and Andrea Salud.
  • Court of Origin: Court of First Instance of Cebu, 14th Judicial District.
  • Judgment Date: March 31, 1965.

Background of the Case

  • Initial Complaint: Filed by Andrea Salud against her husband, Simplicio Alinsolorin, for separation of conjugal properties and return of paraphernal properties (Civil Case No. R-5682).
  • Petitioner’s Defense: Denied claims and stated that since both parties were elderly and unable to manage their properties, he appointed their grandson, Julian Suaring, to administer their lands.
  • Court Decision: Judgment rendered on July 8, 1959, declared:
    • Certain properties as paraphernal properties of Salud.
    • Remaining properties as conjugal properties, with Alinsolorin as administrator.
    • Alinsolorin required to pay Salud a monthly allowance of P20.00.

Jurisdictional Issue

  • Petitioner’s Argument:
    • The order issued on January 12, 1960, by the respondent judge was beyond jurisdiction as it altered the final judgment.
    • Claimed that the order limited his powers over property administration.
    • Argued that the relief granted was not sought in the contempt motion.

Court's Analysis

  • Finality of Judgment: The decision in Civil Case No. R-5682 had become executory, obligating Alinsolorin to comply with payment.
  • Authority of the Judge:
    • The court maintained the authority to enforce compliance with its judgment.
    • The sale of conjugal properties aimed to evade obligations under the judgment.
  • Order Justification: The judge's order to deposit sale proceeds and pay the monthly allowance was deemed an enforcement measure rather than an alteration of the judgment.

Key Legal Principles

  • Compliance with Court Orders: Parties are obliged to comply with final judgments; failure to do so may lead to contempt proceedings.
  • Judicial Authority: Courts have the jurisdiction to ensure compliance with their orders and to take necessary actions to enforce them.

Important Details

  • Order Issued by Judge on January 12, 1960:
    • Required Alinsolorin to deposit proceeds from the sale of conjugal properties.
    • Mandated payment of the monthly allowance to Salud from these proceeds.
  • Deadline: Alinsolorin was to comply within ten (10) days of receipt of the order.

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court upheld the authority of the lower court to enforce compliance with its judgme...continue reading

Analyze Cases Smarter, Faster
Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.