Title
Dolores Pascual Casal y Ochoa vs. Manuel Quiogue
Case
G. R. No. 38951
Decision Date
Jun 9, 1934
The Supreme Court affirmed the order of the Court of First Instance of Rizal dated November 4, 1932, without special pronouncement as to costs.
Font Size

G. R. No. 38951

[ G. R. No. 38951. June 09, 1934 ]

DOLORES PASCUAL CASAL Y OCHOA, ETC., APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. MANUEL QUIOGUE, MOVANT AND APPELLANT.

D E C I S I O N


J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________4th__________ day of _________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without special pronouncement as to the costs.

It is further ordered that the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ from the __________xx_________ xx_________ xx_________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.




For use as a guide and tool to complement traditional legal research. AI-generated content may need verification.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.