Title
Worcester vs. Bucknall Steamship Lines, Ltd.
Case
G.R. No. 7027
Decision Date
Mar 20, 1912
A new trial is granted due to newly discovered evidence in a cargo loss dispute involving a steamship.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 7027)

Facts:

  • The case George E. Worcester vs. Bucknall Steamship Lines, Ltd. was decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines on March 20, 1912.
  • Plaintiff George E. Worcester filed a complaint against Bucknall Steamship Lines, Ltd. regarding the loss of cargo due to the sinking of the steamship Kaloma in Singapore's harbor.
  • The sinking occurred while the ship was attempting to extinguish a fire in the case-oil section of its cargo.
  • After the lower court ruled in favor of Worcester, the defendant sought a new trial, citing newly discovered evidence—a deposition from the master of the Kaloma about the fire and cargo loss.
  • The Supreme Court needed to determine the admissibility of this new evidence and whether a new trial was warranted.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted a new trial, contingent upon the defendant-appellant paying all accrued costs up to the lower court's judgment date.
  • The plaintiff was allowed to dismiss his complaint within thirty days of the record's return to the lower court without incurring additional costs.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court recognized the challenges in obtaining testimony from the master of an ocean-going vessel regarding events that occurred months earlier in a foreign port.
  • The court noted that the master remained employed by the defendant after the incident, indicating that securing his testimony was feasible.
  • The significance of the new evidence was highlighted, as it could potentially show that the fire was not due to the negl...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.