Title
Vda. de Decena vs. De los Angeles
Case
G.R. No. L-29317
Decision Date
May 29, 1971
In Vda. de Decena v. De los Angeles, the court grants a writ to prevent the execution of a demolition order, ruling that the order was void and the petitioner was not a party to the original case.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-29317)

Facts:

  • Petitioner, Marcela Sabulao Vda. de Decena, is the mother of the defendant in Civil Case No. Q-5123 entitled "People's Homesite & Housing Corporation vs. Joaquin Decena" for ejectment.
  • The court rendered a decision in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the premises and pay monthly rent.
  • The decision became final on July 14, 1961.
  • After more than five years, on June 24, 1968, the court issued a demolition order to enforce the judgment.
  • The petitioner argued that the order was void because she was not a party to the original case and the court no longer had jurisdiction to execute the dormant judgment upon mere motion.
  • The petitioner also claimed that the order was issued after the expiration of the five-year period from the final judgment.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The demolition order is v...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The order was issued after the expiration of the five-year period and the court no longer had jurisdiction to execute the judgment.
  • Under the Rules of Court, the plaintiff must institute a new action to revive the judgment, not execute it upon mere motion.
  • Failure to object to a writ of execution issued after five years does not validate it.
  • The action to revive the judgment prescribed in ten years from the date the judgme...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.