Title
United Philippines Lines, Inc. vs. Alkuino, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 245960
Decision Date
Jul 14, 2021
Seafarer suffered back injury, deemed partially disabled by company doctor; employer and president held solidarily liable for $20,154 under labor laws.
Font Size:

Case Digest (G.R. No. 245960)

Facts:

Employment and Contract Details:

  • On November 24, 2014, United Philippine Lines, Inc. (UPLI) hired Juanito P. Alkuino, Jr. (respondent) as Assistant Stage Manager for Holland America Line Westours, Inc. (Holland) under a four-month contract aboard the vessel "Westerdam."
  • His duties included assisting the manager, supervising, and organizing the stage before, during, and after shows.
  • His employment was governed by the HAL AMOSUP Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) covering January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017.

Pre-Employment Medical Examination:

  • Respondent underwent a pre-employment medical examination and was declared fit for sea duties.

Onboard Injury and Medical Treatment:

  • On March 20, 2015, respondent experienced back pain after moving boxes for a show. The pain worsened, leading to lower back pain and right leg numbness.
  • He was treated by the ship doctor with pain relievers and later referred to an orthopedic doctor in Florida, U.S.A., where he was diagnosed with lumbar disc disorder.
  • On April 13, 2015, he was repatriated for medical reasons.

Post-Repatriation Medical Treatment:

  • Upon arrival in the Philippines on April 16, 2015, UPLI referred respondent to Shiphealth, Inc. for further treatment.
  • An MRI revealed disc degeneration at L4-L5, and he was advised to undergo physical therapy (PT) sessions.
  • The company-designated physician recommended surgery (transforaminal interlumbar fusion), but respondent refused and opted for continued PT sessions.
  • On August 5, 2015, the company-designated physician issued a Final Medical Report declaring respondent "maximally medically improved" with a Grade 8 partial permanent disability (moderate rigidity or 2/3 loss of motion or lifting power of the trunk).

Consultation with Personal Physician:

  • Respondent consulted his personal physician, Dr. Manuel Fidel M. Magtira, who assessed him as permanently and totally disabled.
  • Respondent requested UPLI to refer his case to a third doctor, but UPLI ignored the request.

Filing of Complaint:

  • Respondent filed a complaint with the National Conciliation Mediation Board (NCMB)-Panel of Voluntary Arbitrators (PVA) seeking permanent and total disability benefits.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • (Unlock)

Ratio:

  1. Final and Definitive Assessment: The company-designated physician's assessment, issued within the 120-day reglementary period, is conclusive. The Court reiterated that a seafarer's disability is deemed permanent and total only if no definitive assessment is made within 120 or 240 days. In this case, the company-designated physician's timely and definitive assessment of a Grade 8 partial permanent disability prevails over the personal physician's assessment.

  2. Solidary Liability of Corporate Officers: Under Section 10 of RA 8042, as amended, corporate officers are jointly and solidarily liable with the recruitment/placement agency for money claims of overseas Filipino workers. Thus, Consunji, as the owner and president of UPLI, is solidarily liable with UPLI.

  3. Computation of Disability Benefits: The Court applied the HAL AMOSUP CBA and the POEA-SEC to compute respondent's disability benefits. The Grade 8 disability rating corresponds to a 33.59% disability, resulting in a benefit of US$20,154.00.

  4. No Basis for Attorney’s Fees: The Court found no evidence of bad faith or unjustified refusal by UPLI to pay the claim, thus deleting the award of attorney’s fees.

Conclusion:

The Supreme Court modified the Court of Appeals' decision, ruling that respondent is entitled to partial and permanent disability benefits of US$20,154.00, with Consunji solidarily liable with UPLI. The award of attorney’s fees was deleted.


Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.