Title
People vs. Palisoc
Case
G.R. No. 11696
Decision Date
Mar 15, 1917
Defendants acquitted of robbery due to insufficient evidence and witness credibility issues, highlighting the presumption of innocence and the requirement for strong proof.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 11696)

Facts:

  • Maria Guillerma Palisoc, Serviliano Carino, and Vicente Aduan appealed a judgment from the Court of First Instance of Pangasinan dated March 15, 1917.
  • The defendants were convicted of robbery and received varying prison sentences: Palisoc was sentenced to twelve years and one day of reclusion temporal, while Carino and Aduan received twelve years and one day of cadena temporal.
  • They were ordered to jointly indemnify the victim, Librada Villarin, P4,000 and cover the costs of the proceedings.
  • The incident occurred on September 2, 1914, when Catalina Salvador, a servant of Villarin, was approached by Palisoc, who allegedly offered her P100 to leave a window open.
  • The next day, Carino and Aduan, using a ladder borrowed by Palisoc, entered Villarin's house and stole a trunk containing over P4,000 in cash and P3,000 in jewelry.
  • The theft was discovered when the trunk fell, awakening Villarin's mother, and the stolen items were later found hidden on Palisoc's land.
  • The trial court based its conviction on the testimony of Salvador, supported by circumstantial evidence.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court of the Philippines reversed the trial court's judgment, acquitting all three defendants.
  • The court determined that the evidence was insufficient to support the conv...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court reiterated the principle that every defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • The court critically examined Catalina Salvador's testimony, finding it inconsistent and lacking corroboration.
  • It noted that the circumstantial evidence presented did not convincingly link the de...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.