Title
People vs Manalang
Case
G.R. No. 1046
Decision Date
Mar 21, 1903
Defendant's failure to object to the omission of Constabulary membership in the prosecution leads to a waiver, resulting in the affirmation of the judgment and penalty.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 1046)

Facts:

  • Felix Manalang, a member of the Constabulary, was accused of committing a crime against Tomas Lacsamana on July 11, 1902, in Bacolor, Pampanga.
  • Manalang, along with two companions, visited Lacsamana's house searching for a revolver.
  • Upon Lacsamana's denial of possession, he was forcibly seized, stretched on the ground, and tortured, including being made to swallow water through a cane, which broke one of his teeth.
  • Lacsamana was unlawfully detained at a police station until the night of July 12, 1902.
  • Manalang demanded 15 pesos from Lacsamana's wife, Ines Garcia, threatening further harm to her husband if she did not pay.
  • Ines borrowed the money from Felipe Garcia, which was delivered to Manalang, leading to Lacsamana's release.
  • The incident was reported to the municipal president by Pedro de Jesus, resulting in the provincial fiscal filing charges.
  • Evidence showed that Manalang committed offenses defined under section 19 of Act No. 175, which punishes extortion and unlawful detention.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The court ruled that Felix Manalang was guilty of the crime as charged, affirming the lower court's judgment.
  • The court found that the alleged defect in the information regarding Manalang's status as a Constabulary member did not invalidate the proceedings.
  • The court hel...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The court's decision was based on overwhelming evidence of Manalang's involvement in the unlawful detention and extortion of Tomas Lacsamana.
  • The torture inflicted on Lacsamana and the demand for money from his wife were established facts constituting the crime under sec...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.