Title
People vs Lazaro
Case
G.R. No. 11562
Decision Date
Aug 31, 1916
Armed band robbed Catalina Madrazo’s home, injuring Inocencio Alberto. Defendants convicted of robbery in band; penalty reduced by Supreme Court.
Font Size:

Case Digest (G.R. No. 11562)

Facts:

  1. Incident Overview:

    • On August 20, 1916, around 10 PM, an armed band of at least 17 men surrounded the house of Catalina Madrazo in the barrio of Mabini, Urdaneta, Pangasinan.
    • Two armed men entered the house, demanded money, and struck Catalina and her granddaughter, Maura Lomboy, with the flat sides of their bolos.
    • Catalina handed over P40 and P150, while Maura, fearing for her grandmother’s life, retrieved P2,020 from a hiding place and gave it to the robbers.
  2. Injuries and Resistance:

    • Jorge Galang and Inocencio Alberto attempted to help but were attacked by the bandits below. Alberto suffered a severe bolo wound to his arm, rendering it permanently useless.
  3. Witness Testimonies:

    • Catalina Madrazo: Did not recognize the robbers due to fear and physical trauma.
    • Maura Lomboy: Initially claimed she did not recognize the robbers but later identified Simon Lazaro and Juan Lazaro as the men who entered the house.
    • Jorge Galang: Initially denied recognizing the robbers but later identified Simon and Juan Lazaro when they were arrested.
    • Telesforo Baltazar: Testified that he was forced to accompany the band and identified several members, including Francisco Manzano.
    • Rufino Galina: Testified that Francisco Manzano invited him to join the robbery and later confirmed the robbery’s success.
  4. Defense Arguments:

    • The defendants (Simon Lazaro, Juan Lazaro, and Francisco Manzano) denied involvement, claiming they were falsely accused due to personal enmity.
  5. Trial Court Findings:

    • The trial court convicted the defendants of robbery in band with serious physical injuries, imposing a penalty of 19 years, 1 month, and 11 days of cadena temporal.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • (Unlock)

Ratio:

  1. Identification of Defendants:

    • The testimonies of Maura Lomboy and Jorge Galang, corroborated by other witnesses, sufficiently established the identity of Simon Lazaro and Juan Lazaro as the robbers who entered the house.
    • The initial reluctance of witnesses to identify the robbers was due to fear, which was understandable given the violent nature of the crime.
  2. Qualification of the Crime:

    • The crime was properly classified as robbery in band under Article 503, paragraph 4, as the robbery involved a group of armed men and resulted in serious physical injuries.
    • The trial court erred in applying paragraph 3 of Article 503, as the complaint did not allege the loss of a principal member, only the loss of use of the arm.
  3. Aggravating Circumstances:

    • Nocturnity was correctly applied as the crime was committed at night to facilitate the robbery and ensure impunity.
  4. Penalty Adjustment:

    • The penalty was reduced to 14 years and 8 months of cadena temporal, as the trial court incorrectly applied the maximum penalty under paragraph 3 of Article 503.


Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.