Title
People vs Exaltacion
Case
G.R. No. 1481
Decision Date
Feb 17, 1904
Defendants accused of rebellion in the Philippines are acquitted after proving they were forced to pledge allegiance under duress by brigands, with their credible testimony and lack of sufficient evidence leading to their acquittal.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 1481)

Facts:

  • Defendants: Liberato Exaltacion and Buenaventura Tanchinco.
  • Charge: Rebellion against the United States Government in the Philippines.
  • Date of Information Filing: March 26, 1903.
  • Allegation: Defendants swore allegiance to the Katipunan Society, aimed at overthrowing the government by force, after November 4, 1901.
  • Key Testimony: Don Pablo Tecson, provincial governor of Bulacan, testified about the arrest in March 1903.
  • Evidence: Documents signed by the defendants, captured in the encampment of bandit leader Contreras, presented as evidence.
  • Defendants' Claim: They were forced to sign the documents under threat of death by brigands.
  • Corroborating Witnesses: Exequiel Casa, Fernando Nieto, and the municipal president of Meycauayan.
  • Document Dates: July 4 and July 17, 1902, containing oaths of allegiance to the Katipunan Society.
  • Additional Testimonies: Lazaro Yusay and Bonifacio Morales confirmed the defendants' capture and reporting to local authorities.
  • Lower Court: Imposed a penalty based on the evidence presented.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • Criminal Liability: The Supreme Court ruled that the defendants were not criminally liable for rebellion due to acting under duress.
  • Sufficiency of Evidence: The Supreme Court found the evidence insufficient to establish the defendants' guilt b...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Duress: The Supreme Court, through Justice Torres, held that the defendants were relieved from criminal liability due to the duress under which they acted.
  • Kidnapping and Compulsion: Evidence showed the defendants were kidnapped by brigands from the Contreras band and compelled to sign the documents while in captivity.
  • Reporting to Authorities: Defendants' immediate reporting to local authorities upon release corroborated their testimony and demonstrated their innocence.
  • Insufficient Evidence: Prosecution's evidence, particularly the documents signed by the defendants, was insufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Credibility of Testimonies: Minor discrepanc...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.