Title
People vs. Bundoc
Case
G.R. No. 5318
Decision Date
Dec 23, 1909
Defendants charged with homicide claim self-defense, but court rules their actions were not justified due to lack of prior illegal aggression, resulting in guilty verdict and imposition of lesser penalty.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 5318)

Facts:

  • On the night of January 2, 1909, Rafael Bumanglag discovered that 40 bundles of palay had been stolen from his granary in San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte.
  • The next morning, Bumanglag found the stolen palay in a nearby sugar cane field, about 100 meters from his granary.
  • To catch the thief, Bumanglag, along with Gregorio Bundoc, Antonio Ribao, and Saturnino Tumamao, decided to stake out the field that night.
  • Around 10 PM, Guillermo Ribis appeared and attempted to take the palay.
  • Bumanglag and his companions attacked Ribis with sticks and cutting weapons, resulting in Ribis's death.
  • Believing Ribis to be responsible for several local thefts, the group acted without any legal authority.
  • The provincial fiscal filed a homicide charge against Bumanglag, Bundoc, and Ribao on January 15, 1909.
  • The trial court sentenced them to fourteen years, eight months, and one day of reclusion temporal, along with an indemnity of P1,000 to Ribis's heirs.
  • Only Gregorio Bundoc appealed the decision.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The court ruled that there was no unlawful aggression by Guillermo Ribis that justified the plea of self-defense by Gregorio Bundoc.
  • The court found that the actions of Gregorio Bundoc and his companions were not reasonably necessary to prevent or repel any alleged aggression.
  • ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The court determined that the plea of self-defense was not admissible because there was no evidence of unlawful aggression by Ribis.
  • The bolo found in its sheath on Ribis's body indicated that he had not attacked Bumanglag and his companions.
  • The court noted that the serious wounds inflicted on Ribis were consistent with the use of cutting and stabbing weapons, contradicting the defendants' claim that they only used sticks.
  • Given these facts,...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.