Title
People vs. Aquino
Case
G.R. No. 4500
Decision Date
Sep 8, 1908
Defendants in U.S. v. Aquino successfully appeal their simple robbery conviction, citing procedural issues and insufficient evidence, leading to a judgment reversal and a new guilty verdict.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 4500)

Facts:

  • Defendants: Marcelo Aquino, Toribio Limos, Ignacio Varela.
  • Charged with robbery in an armed band (robo en cuadrilla) on June 28, 1907.
  • Incident occurred at 2 AM on April 10, 1907, in Rimos, Luna, La Union.
  • Accused unlawfully entered Bonifacia Raso's home, using violence to steal property worth 2,338 pesetas belonging to Doroteo Barroso and Bonifacia Raso.
  • Doroteo Barroso was bound and thrown to the floor during the robbery.
  • Trial court convicted the appellants, sentencing them to nine years of presidio mayor, accessory penalties, restitution, and trial costs.
  • Defense argued for reversal based on lack of preliminary investigation, failure to arraign, defects in information, and insufficient evidence of identity.
  • Two preliminary investigations dismissed charges due to insufficient evidence; a third investigation found probable cause, leading to trial.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The court ruled that the appellants waived their right to a preliminary investigation.
  • The court found that the appellants were properly arraigned and pleaded not guilty.
  • The court determined that the information was not defective and adequately charged the crime of robbery in an armed band.
  • The court concluded t...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The court held that the appellants effectively waived their right to a preliminary investigation by not objecting to the proceedings before the appeal.
  • The court emphasized that the right to a preliminary investigation can be waived, and the lack of objection indicated acceptance of the process.
  • Regarding arraignment, the court noted that the record showed the appellants pleaded not guilty, addressing the defense's claim of a lack of formal plea.
  • The information filed was deemed sufficient,...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.