Title
Triplex Enterprises, Inc. vs. PNB-Republic Bank
Case
G.R. No. 151007
Decision Date
Jul 17, 2006
Triplex Enterprises, Inc. v. PNB-Republic Bank and Solid Builders, Inc. involves the annulment of a land sale contract due to lack of approval from the bank's Board of Directors, with the Supreme Court ruling that the trial court's decision to disallow the admission of a legal opinion did not constitute grave abuse of discretion.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 151007)

Facts:

  • Triplex Enterprises, Inc. sought to annul a land sale contract.
  • The sale involved two parcels of land in Tagaytay City, sold by PNB-Republic Bank to Solid Builders, Inc.
  • Triplex claimed the sale was invalid due to the absence of Board of Directors' approval as mandated by Board Resolution No. 000231-1993.
  • This resolution required Board approval for sales exceeding P3 million.
  • After losing a bid for the land, Triplex hired Atty. Romeo Roque, a real estate broker, who sought a legal opinion from the Office of the Government Corporate Counsel (OGCC).
  • The OGCC opined that the lack of Board approval rendered the sale contract unperfected.
  • During the trial, Triplex attempted to present Atty. Roque's testimony regarding the OGCC's opinion, but the respondents objected based on attorney-client privilege.
  • The trial court upheld the objection, prompting Triplex to file a petition for certiorari with the Court of Appeals, which was dismissed.
  • Triplex subsequently escalated the issue to the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled against Triplex, denying the petition for review on certiorari.
  • The Court upheld the findings of the Court of Appeals, stating that the trial court did not commit grave abuse of discretion in excluding Roque's testimo...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Certiorari is a special civil action applicable only when a tribunal acts without or in excess of its jurisdiction or with grave abuse of discretion.
  • The writ of certiorari is not a remedy for every erroneous interlocutory order; it is limited to extraordinary cases where lower court actions are wholly void.
  • Errors in the application of law or appreciation of evidence do not deprive a...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.