Title
Torres vs. National Labor Relations Commission
Case
G.R. No. 90338
Decision Date
Aug 9, 1991
The Supreme Court upheld the NLRC's ruling ordering the reinstatement of four illegally dismissed teachers, along with backwages and emergency cost of living allowance.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 60077)

Facts:

  • Jaime T. Torres is the petitioner, while the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and private respondents Lota Alafriz, Marivic Valdeviso, Annabelle Fabro, and Leylita Lawig are the respondents.
  • The private respondents, teachers at St. James Child Care Center in Quezon City, filed a complaint against Torres for illegal dismissal, illegal deductions, underpayment, and non-payment of wages.
  • They were employed at different times with salaries ranging from P800.00 to P1,700.00 per month.
  • In September 1985, the school required teachers to submit original transcripts of records by October 5, 1985, warning that non-compliance would result in withheld salaries.
  • Most teachers, including the private respondents, did not submit the required documents, leading to withheld salaries.
  • On October 7, 1985, the private respondents were absent from classes and were not allowed to return to work upon their return.
  • They filed a complaint with the Labor Arbiter on November 28, 1985.
  • The Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of the private respondents on June 13, 1986, ordering reinstatement and back wages.
  • The NLRC modified this decision, limiting back wages to one year without deductions.
  • The petitioner appealed, arguing that the dismissal was justified due to the private respondents' absence and non-compliance.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, affirming the NLRC's resolutions dated October 30, 1987, September 1, 1989, and September 29, 1989.
  • The Court upheld the NLRC's findings that the dismissal was illegal, that the pr...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court found no grave abuse of discretion by the NLRC in its findings.
  • It clarified that the private respondents' absence on October 7, 1985, was not a strike but an effort to secure their transcripts to receive their salaries.
  • The Labor Arbiter's conclusion of illegal dismissal was supported by the abse...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.