Title
Tan vs. De Leon
Case
G.R. No. L-15254
Decision Date
Sep 16, 1961
A court rules that a regional office of the Department of Labor does not have jurisdiction over money claims of laborers, rendering their decision null and void.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-15254)

Facts:

  • Complaint filed by respondents Belen de Leon, Edilberto de Leon, Estela de Leon, and Paz Topaya against petitioner Vicente Tan and the Beauty Novelties and Toys Factory.
  • Respondents claimed unpaid overtime pay, differential pay, terminal pay, and attorney's fees.
  • Regional Office No. 3 of the Department of Labor rendered a decision in favor of the respondents, ordering Tan and the factory to pay them a total of P6,718.80, plus attorney's fees.
  • Decision became final and a writ of execution was issued.
  • Tan filed a petition for certiorari in the Court of First Instance of Manila, arguing that the regional office had no jurisdiction over the claims.
  • Court granted the petition and set aside the decision of the regional office.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The regional office does not have jurisdiction over the money claims of laborers in this case.
  • The decision rendered by the regional office wa...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The court based its ruling on Reorganization Plan No. 20-A, which grants regional offices original and exclusive jurisdiction over money claims of laborers.
  • However, the court declared that this provision is null and void because it was made without authority.
  • The court cited previous decisions that have held the same.
  • Claims for overtime pay, differential pay, terminal pay, and attorney's fees are mere money claim...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.