Case Digest (G.R. No. L-15254)
Facts:
- Complaint filed by respondents Belen de Leon, Edilberto de Leon, Estela de Leon, and Paz Topaya against petitioner Vicente Tan and the Beauty Novelties and Toys Factory.
- Respondents claimed unpaid overtime pay, differential pay, terminal pay, and attorney's fees.
- Regional Office No. 3 of the Department of Labor rendered a decision in favor of the respondents, ordering Tan and the factory to pay them a total of P6,718.80, plus attorney's fees.
- Decision became final and a writ of execution was issued.
- Tan filed a petition for certiorari in the Court of First Instance of Manila, arguing that the regional office had no jurisdiction over the claims.
- Court granted the petition and set aside the decision of the regional office.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The regional office does not have jurisdiction over the money claims of laborers in this case.
- The decision rendered by the regional office wa...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The court based its ruling on Reorganization Plan No. 20-A, which grants regional offices original and exclusive jurisdiction over money claims of laborers.
- However, the court declared that this provision is null and void because it was made without authority.
- The court cited previous decisions that have held the same.
- Claims for overtime pay, differential pay, terminal pay, and attorney's fees are mere money claim...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. L-15254)
Facts:
The case of Tan v. De Leon involves respondents Belen de Leon, Edilberto de Leon, Estela de Leon, and Paz Topaya who filed a complaint for the payment of differential pay, terminal pay, and attorney's fees against petitioner Vicente Tan and the Beauty Novelties and Toys Factory. The regional office of the Department of Labor rendered a decision in favor of the respondents, ordering Tan and the factory to pay the total sum of P6,718.80 as unpaid overtime pay, differential pay, and separation pay, plus attorney's fees. The decision became final and a writ of execution was issued. However, Tan filed a petition for certiorari in the Court of First Instance of Manila, arguing that the regional office had no jurisdiction over the claims. The court granted the petition and set aside the decision of the regional office. On appeal, the Court affirmed the decision of the lower court.
Issue:
The main issue in this case is whether the regional office of the Department of Labor has jurisdiction over money claims of laborers.
Ruling:
The Court ruled that the provisions of Reorganization Plan No. 20...