Case Digest (G.R. No. 9232)
Facts:
- Ildefonso Tambunting filed a complaint against Virginia de Vera and other defendants, including the heirs of Antonino de Guzman and Gregoria de la Cruz.
- The complaint was submitted on September 6, 1912, in the Court of First Instance of Manila.
- Tambunting sought recovery of a parcel of land on Calle Benavides, Nos. 723 and 725, measuring 599 square meters and 61 square centimeters.
- He claimed ownership through a sale with a right of repurchase from his tenant, Andres de Guzman.
- The defendants argued that the property belonged to their deceased ancestors' estate and denied any lease agreement with Tambunting.
- On April 28, 1913, the lower court ruled in favor of Tambunting, ordering the defendants to return possession and pay back rent of P4,325.
- The defendants appealed the decision.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's decision, ruling in favor of Ildefonso Tambunting.
- The court determined that Tambunting was the rightful owner and entitled to possession of the property.
- The defendants'...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court emphasized that the defendants did not provide adequate evidence to support their ownership claim.
- Virginia de Vera's testimony failed to clarify why property taxes were unpaid until 1911, while Tambunting had paid them for previous years.
- The defendants did not present evidence of their alleged offer to redeem the property.
- The untranscribed stenographic notes from the trial were not in a reviewable form, preventing the appellate court from reassessing the lowe...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 9232)
Facts:
The case involves Ildefonso Tambunting, who filed a complaint against Virginia de Vera and several other defendants, including the heirs of Antonino de Guzman and Gregoria de la Cruz. The complaint was lodged on September 6, 1912, in the Court of First Instance of Manila, seeking the recovery of a parcel of land located on Calle Benavides, Nos. 723 and 725, with an area of 599 square meters and 61 square centimeters. Tambunting claimed ownership of the property, asserting that he acquired it through a sale with a right of repurchase from Andres de Guzman, who had been his tenant. The defendants, on the other hand, contended that the property belonged to the estate of their deceased ancestors and denied any lease agreement with Tambunting. The lower court, presided over by Judge A. S. Crossfield, ruled in favor of Tambunting on April 28, 1913, ordering the defendants to restore possession of the property to him and to pay back rent amounting to P4,325. The defendants appealed the decision, leading to the current case.
Issue:
- Did the lower court err in ruling that Ildefonso Tambunting was the rightful owner and entitled to possession of the property?
- Was there sufficient evidence to support the de...