Title
Sumulong vs. Moran
Case
G.R. No. 23451
Decision Date
Dec 2, 1925
A suit to foreclose a real mortgage becomes complicated when a bill of intervention is filed, leading to questions of jurisdiction and proper service, ultimately resulting in the Supreme Court ruling in favor of the plaintiff and declaring the judgment in favor of the intervenor null and void.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 23451)

Facts:

  • The case involves a suit to foreclose a real mortgage on property owned by the defendant, Josefa Moran.
  • The plaintiff, Juan Sumulong, is the administrator of the estate of Trinidad H. Pardo de Tavera, deceased.
  • The defendant admits the indebtedness but seeks to recover from the plaintiff on a counterclaim.
  • Consuelo Legarda filed a bill of intervention, claiming a second mortgage on the same property.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff and affirmed the judgment rendered in their favor. The defendant's admission of the debt and the execution of the mortgage to secure its payment were considered. The court also found no merit in the special defenses alleged in the defendant's answer. However, the court decl...(Unlock)

Ratio:

The court based its decision on Section 121 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which states that a party seeking to intervene in a foreclosure suit must first obtain permission from the court. After obtaining permission, the intervenor must file and serve a copy of their bill of intervention on all adverse parties.

  • The record showed that the defendant was not served with notice of the motion for a bill of intervention, nor was sh...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.