Facts:

• Dr. Rolando A. Sulla lodged an administrative complaint against Judge Rodolfo C. Ramos on May 21, 1999.
• The complaint stemmed from the judge's unreasonable delay in resolving Criminal Case No. 8121, involving acts of lasciviousness against Dr. Sulla's minor daughter, Marissa T. Sulla.
• The case was submitted for decision in April 1997, yet by May 1999, no resolution had been provided despite Dr. Sulla's repeated inquiries.
• Dr. Sulla expressed concerns that external pressures might be influencing the judge's inaction and feared the case would remain unresolved due to Judge Ramos's upcoming retirement.
• In his defense, Judge Ramos claimed the case was submitted on July 9, 1997, and attributed the delay to his heavy workload and health issues.
• The Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) conducted an investigation and confirmed that the judge had not acted on the case for over two years, which was deemed unacceptable.
• The OCA recommended a fine of P20,000.00 for gross inefficiency, emphasizing the necessity for judges to issue timely decisions to uphold public confidence in the judiciary.

Issue:

• (Unlock)

Ruling:

• The Supreme Court found Judge Rodolfo C. Ramos guilty of gross inefficiency for failing to decide Criminal Case No. 8121 within the required timeframe.
• The Court concurred with the OCA's findings and recommendations but reduced the proposed fine from P...(Unlock)

Ratio:

• The Supreme Court emphasized the vital importance of timely judicial decisions, reiterating that "justice delayed is justice denied."
• The Court referenced Rule 3.05, Canon 3 of the Code of Judicial Conduct, and Section 15(1) and (2) of Article VIII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, which require judges to resolve cases promptly to maintain public trust.
• Judge Ramos's prolonged inaction, despite multiple reminders from Dr. Sulla, caused significant ...continue reading