Title
St. Luke's Medical Center, Inc. vs. Sanchez
Case
G.R. No. 212054
Decision Date
Mar 11, 2015
Nurse dismissed for unauthorized removal of medical supplies; Supreme Court upheld termination, citing dishonesty and violation of hospital rules.
Font Size:

Case Digest (G.R. No. 212054)

Facts:

Employment and Incident Details
Maria Theresa V. Sanchez was hired by St. Luke’s Medical Center, Inc. (SLMC) as a Staff Nurse on June 29, 2009. She was assigned to the Pediatric Unit in SLMC, Quezon City. On May 29, 2011, at the end of her shift, Sanchez was subjected to a routine inspection at the SLMC Centralization Entrance/Exit. Security Guard Jaime Manzanade noticed a pouch in her bag, which contained various medical items, including syringes, cotton balls, gloves, and other medical supplies. Sanchez claimed the items were excess stocks from discharged patients and were intended for future use in case of shortages.

Investigation and Confession
Sanchez was brought to the SLMC In-House Security Department (IHSD), where she wrote an incident report and submitted a handwritten letter of apology. In the letter, she admitted to knowingly taking the items despite knowing it was prohibited. She explained that she had hoarded the items for future use during shortages.

Disciplinary Actions
SLMC conducted an investigation and placed Sanchez under preventive suspension on June 3, 2011. After a case conference, SLMC terminated her employment effective July 6, 2011, citing violation of the SLMC Code of Discipline, specifically Section 1, Rule 1 on Acts of Dishonesty, which includes theft, pilferage, and misappropriation of funds.

Sanchez’s Defense
Sanchez filed a complaint for illegal dismissal before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC), asserting that she had no intention of stealing the items and that they were not SLMC’s property. She argued that her handwritten letter was inadmissible as it was made without legal counsel.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • (Unlock)

Ratio:

  1. Management Prerogative: Employers have the right to prescribe reasonable rules and regulations for the conduct of their business. Employees are duty-bound to obey these rules, and willful disobedience justifies termination.
  2. Just Cause for Termination: Sanchez’s actions violated SLMC’s Code of Discipline, which prohibits theft, pilferage, and misappropriation of property, whether belonging to the hospital, employees, or customers. Her deliberate disregard of the rules constituted serious misconduct.
  3. Admissibility of Confession: Sanchez’s handwritten letter was admissible as evidence, as it was made voluntarily and not during a custodial investigation requiring legal counsel.
  4. Proportionality of Penalty: The Court found that the penalty of dismissal was proportionate to the offense, considering the deliberate nature of the misconduct and the need to maintain discipline in the workplace.
  5. Distinction from Criminal Cases: The absence of criminal charges or actual damage to SLMC did not negate the employer’s right to terminate for just cause. Labor and criminal cases are distinct proceedings, and conviction in criminal court is not necessary for dismissal in labor cases.

The Supreme Court reversed the decisions of the NLRC and the Court of Appeals, reinstating the Labor Arbiter’s ruling that Sanchez’s dismissal was valid.


Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.