Title
Spouses Estonina vs. Court of Appeals
Case
G.R. No. 111547
Decision Date
Jan 27, 1997
The court ruled in favor of Santiago Garcia's estate, declaring the public auction sale of a disputed Laguna parcel of land null and void.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 111547)

Facts:

  • Petitioners: Trinidad S. Estonina and Paulino Estonina.
  • Respondents: Court of Appeals, spouses Celso Atayan and Nilda Hicban, and heirs of Santiago Garcia.
  • Dispute involves a 273 square meter parcel of land, Lot C of amended plan Psu-22983 Amd., in Barrio Santisima Cruz, Sta. Cruz, Laguna.
  • Originally covered by Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. T-19175, issued to Santiago Garcia, who died on October 2, 1967.
  • On March 10, 1973, Trinidad Estonina obtained a writ of preliminary attachment against Consuelo Garcia, Santiago's widow, inscribing a notice on TCT No. T-19175.
  • Series of transactions led to the cancellation of TCT No. T-19175 and issuance of TCT No. 77215, later cancelled for TCT No. 82229.
  • On August 14, 1977, Santiago's children from his first marriage sold their shares to spouses Atayan, who later purchased shares from Consuelo Garcia and her children.
  • Trinidad Estonina won a judgment in Civil Case No. 88430, leading to a public auction where he was the highest bidder.
  • The Intermediate Appellate Court declared TCT No. T-82229 a nullity, resulting in TCT No. T-99961 issued to Trinidad Estonina.
  • On July 25, 1985, spouses Atayan filed for annulment of the sheriff's sale and TCT No. T-99961, claiming ownership of their shares.
  • The Regional Trial Court (RTC) dismissed their complaint, stating the property was conjugal and only Consuelo's share could be attached.
  • The Court of Appeals reversed the RTC's decision, declaring the property as Santiago's exclusive property and ordering cancellation of TCT No. T-99961.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court denied the petition by the spouses Estonina and affirmed the Court of Appea...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court stated that the factual findings of the Court of Appeals are generally conclusive, especially when conflicting with the trial court's findings.
  • The Court of Appeals correctly identified the property as Santiago Garcia's exclusive property, inherited from his mother and not acquired during his marriage to Consuelo Garcia.
  • Article 160 of the Civil Code presumes that property acquired during marriage belongs to the conjugal partnership only if proven to ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.