Title
Soriano vs. People
Case
G.R. No. 238282
Decision Date
Apr 26, 2022
The City Veterinary Office team member and co-accused were acquitted of corruption charges due to insufficient evidence and lack of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt regarding meat product confiscation.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 238282)

Facts:

  • Joseph T. Soriano (petitioner) filed against the People of the Philippines (respondent).
  • Supreme Court decision rendered on April 26, 2022.
  • Complaint initiated on April 23, 2009, by George T. Li, owner of San Vicente Dressing Plant (SVDP).
  • Allegations against Soriano and several employees of the City Government of Alaminos, Pangasinan, including Dr. Ronaldo B. Abarra, Ryan R. Pagador, and Lyndon R. Millan.
  • Violations cited under Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act).
  • Incident occurred on April 17, 2009, when Abarra and his team stopped a delivery van owned by Li, carrying 2,455 kilograms of meat valued at approximately P250,000.
  • Confiscation justified by claims of an incomplete National Meat Inspection Service (NMIS) Certificate.
  • Despite clarifications from SVDP employees, Abarra insisted on impounding the van.
  • Meat was unloaded and distributed to various government agencies by 9:00 a.m. that day.
  • The Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon recommended charges, leading to an Information filed with the Sandiganbayan on November 11, 2013.
  • Sandiganbayan found Soriano and co-accused guilty on January 19, 2018, sentencing them to imprisonment and ordering restitution of the meat's value.
  • Motions for reconsideration were denied on February 27, 2018, prompting Soriano to file a petition for review.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted the petition, reversing the Sandiganbayan's decision.
  • Joseph T. Soriano and his co-accused, Dr. Ronaldo B. Abarra and Lyndon R. Millan, were acquitted.
  • The Court determin...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • Public office is a public trust, and public officers are held to a higher standard of accountability.
  • The presumption of innocence remains intact for the accused.
  • The prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in graft and corruption cases under RA 3019.
  • To convict under Section 3(e), the prosecution must prove the accused's public officer status, the act's performance in official duties, and that it was done with manifest partiality, evident bad faith, or gross negligence.
  • ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.