Title
Sancho vs. Abella
Case
G.R. No. 39033
Decision Date
Nov 13, 1933
In the case of Sancho v. Abella, the Supreme Court affirms the probate of Matea Abella's will, ruling that despite her age and physical ailments, she was mentally capable of executing the will and that the circumstances surrounding the execution did not constitute undue influence.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 39033)

Facts:

  • Matea Abella, an 88-year-old woman suffering from physical ailments, left her home in Sinait, Ilocos Sur to consult a physician in San Fernando, La Union.
  • During her stay in the convent of the parish church in San Fernando, she consulted with Attorney Teodoro R. Reinoso to draft her will.
  • The will was read to her in her dialect, Ilocano, and she approved it.
  • On April 29, 1932, Matea Abella signed the will in the presence of witnesses, including Father Cordero.
  • Matea Abella passed away on July 3, 1932.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court of First Instance of Ilocos Sur ruled in favor of the applicant-appellee, Mons. Santiago Sancho, and granted the probate of the will.
  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the deci...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court held that neither senile debility, deafness, blindness, nor poor memory is sufficient to establish the presumption that a person is not in the full enjoyment of their mental faculties when there is sufficient evidence of their mental sanity at the time of executing the will.
  • In this case, the court found that Matea Abella, despite her age and physical ailments, was mentally capable of executing her will.
  • The court also ruled that the fact that Matea Abella was given accommodations in a conven...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.