Title
San Miguel Corporation vs. Javate, Jr.
Case
G.R. No. 54244
Decision Date
Jan 27, 1992
The court ruled that San Miguel Corp.'s dismissal of Javate was illegal due to lack of proof of incapacity and failure to obtain Department of Labor clearance.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 54244)

Facts:

  • Ernesto Javate, Jr. was a casual employee of San Miguel Corporation (SMC) at the B-Meg Warehouse in San Miguel, Bulacan.
  • On June 21, 1974, Javate was involved in an accident and was initially confined at Figueroa Emergency Hospital, then transferred to Makati Medical Center.
  • He was discharged on August 16, 1974, with clearance to resume work the next day, after a total of 56 days on sick leave.
  • Javate filed for an 11-day vacation leave from August 17 to August 27, 1974, which was disapproved for not meeting the six-day prior filing requirement.
  • On August 28, 1974, Javate reported for work and corrected his leave certificate to indicate fitness to return on August 17, 1974.
  • He then filed for an additional 15-day vacation leave without pay from August 29 to September 12, 1974, which was also disapproved.
  • On September 1, 1974, SMC "compulsorily retired" Javate, citing exhaustion of sick leave benefits and unfitness to return to work under the company's 1971 Health, Welfare, and Retirement Plan.
  • Javate filed a complaint for illegal dismissal with the Department of Labor on September 25, 1975.
  • The Executive Labor Arbiter ruled in favor of Javate on June 18, 1976, ordering SMC to reinstate him with back wages limited to one year.
  • This decision was affirmed by the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) and the Office of the Secretary of Labor.
  • SMC filed a petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  1. The Supreme Court found no merit in SMC's contention and upheld the factual findings of the labor arbiter, NLRC, and the Department of Labor that Javate was fit to resume work, making his termination illegal.
  2. The Court ruled that Javate was dismissed and not retired, and such dismissal could not be validly done without clearance from the Department of Labor.
  3. The Court held that Javate was not estopp...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that factual findings...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.