Title
Samson vs. Enriquez
Case
G.R. No. L-15264
Decision Date
Dec 22, 1961
A dispute over possession of an agricultural land between Samson and Enriquez and Filoteo leads to the Court of Agrarian Relations asserting jurisdiction based on the existence of a contract of tenancy.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-15264)

Facts:

  • Garcia Samson filed a complaint in the Municipal Court of Zamboanga City against Ramon Enriquez and Fermin Filoteo.
  • Samson sought the recovery of possession of Lot No. 422, damages, and other relief.
  • Samson claimed to have a contract of tenancy with the owners of the land, allowing him to possess and cultivate it in exchange for 25 cavanes of palay payable annually.
  • Samson alleged that the defendants forcibly deprived him of the land's possession and caused damage to his bamboo groves.
  • The defendants denied the plaintiff's claims and argued that Samson was a mere cropper on the land and did not have a written contract with the owners.
  • The defendants also contended that Samson's alleged right to possess the land was on a year-to-year basis and had expired.
  • The defendants filed a counterclaim for moral damages and attorney's fees, alleging that Samson's suit was malicious and unfounded.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Court of Agrarian Relations has jurisdiction ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • When a plaintiff alleges being deprived of possession of an agricultural land under a contract of tenancy, the Court of Agrarian Relations has jurisdiction.
  • Samson claimed to have a contract of tenancy with the owners of the land, which entitled him to possess and cultivate it.
  • Therefore, the Court of Agrarian Relations has jurisdiction over the dispute.
  • The...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.