Title
Salvador vs. Serrano
Case
A.M. No. P-06-2104
Decision Date
Jan 31, 2006
A clerk of court was dismissed for tampering with records and misconduct, underscoring the judiciary's necessity for integrity and honesty.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.M. No. P-06-2104)

Facts:

  • An administrative complaint was filed by Judge Joselito S. Salvador against Romancito M. Serrano, Clerk of Court III of MTCC, Branch 2, San Fernando City, Pampanga.
  • The complaint, dated August 27, 2002, accused Serrano of tampering with records in Civil Case No. 8114, "Rosalina O. Ng v. Jorolan."
  • Allegations included concealing an ex parte proceeding on March 15, 2002, and an order on April 16, 2002, declaring the defendant in default.
  • Serrano was accused of allowing the posting of a bond without the presence of the accused and the presiding judge.
  • The plaintiff filed a motion for default on March 13, 2002, which was heard ex parte on March 15, 2002, due to the defendant's absence.
  • Judge Rodrigo Flores issued an order on April 16, 2002, granting the motion for default.
  • After Judge Flores left for the U.S. on May 6, 2002, Judge Salvador took over and later discovered the previous order of default was not disclosed.
  • Serrano claimed forgetfulness and a heavy workload as reasons for his actions, citing personal issues as contributing factors.
  • The case was referred to the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) and then to the Executive Judge of the Regional Trial Court.
  • On June 11, 2004, the Executive Judge recommended finding Serrano guilty of dishonesty and inefficiency, suggesting dismissal for dishonesty and a six-month suspension for inefficiency.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The court found Romancito M. Serrano guilty of dishonesty for concealing the ex parte proceedings and the order declaring the defendant in default.
  • The court also found Serrano guilty of inefficiency and incompetence for ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court stated that dishonesty is a serious offense that can lead to dismissal from service on the first instance.
  • Serrano's actions were deemed a clear violation of his responsibilities as a Clerk of Court.
  • His concealment of the ex parte proceedings and the order of default was viewed as a deliberate act undermining judicial integrity.
  • The court found Serrano's defense of forgetfulness unconvincing, supported by evidence...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.