Title
Rivas vs. Sison
Case
G.R. No. 140839
Decision Date
May 26, 2005
A former MTRCB employee was acquitted of unauthorized fee allegations due to insufficient evidence, leading to the dismissal of the complaint and the awarding of backwages.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 140839)

Facts:

  • Abelardo C. Rivas is the petitioner against Jesus C. Sison and Armida P. E. Siguion Reyna, former and current chairpersons of the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB).
  • In 1996, the MTRCB, in collaboration with the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI), investigated unauthorized collection of registration fees by MTRCB employees.
  • On June 25, 1996, agents monitored unregistered theaters in Iloilo.
  • Rivas, an MTRCB Registration Officer II, allegedly collected fees from theater owners while posing as an authorized collector.
  • Affidavits against Rivas included claims from Marcelina Concepcion, who stated her husband paid Rivas P1,000.00 for registration fees, and Leonardo Ungoco, Jr., who reported Rivas warned him to pay fees to avoid MTRCB operations.
  • Marvin B. Inigo testified he paid Rivas P1,200.00 in 1992 and 1993 but did not receive a registration certificate.
  • The MTRCB filed an administrative case against Rivas for conduct grossly prejudicial to the service.
  • Rivas contested the charges, claiming a lack of due process, particularly the right to confront his accusers.
  • The MTRCB found him guilty and suspended him for six months.
  • Rivas appealed to the Civil Service Commission, which upheld the MTRCB's decision but modified the penalty regarding reassignment.
  • Rivas sought relief from the Court of Appeals, which dismissed his petition, leading to the current petition for review on certiorari.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted Rivas's petition, reversing the decisions of the Court of Appeals and the MTRCB.
  • The administrative complaint against Rivas was dismissed for lack of merit.
  • Rivas was ordered to...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court noted that while Rivas had opportunities to present his defense, the evidence against him was insufficient and lacked credibility.
  • Due process in administrative proceedings requires notification of charges and a reasonable opportunity to respond.
  • Rivas was able to submit counter-affidavits and present evidence, meeting the minimum due process requirements.
  • The Court...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.