Title
Republic vs. Vegel de Dios
Case
G.R. No. 170459
Decision Date
Feb 9, 2011
The Supreme Court ruled that the order for issuing a new owner’s duplicate title should have been annulled alongside the reconstitution order concerning three parcels of land in Bulacan.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 170459)

Facts:

  • The Republic of the Philippines is the petitioner against respondents Candido, Demetila, Jesus, Angelito, and Teresita Vergel De Dios.
  • The case involves three parcels of land in Angat, Bulacan, covered by Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. T-141671.
  • In 1989, the registered owners sold Lot 1, and Lot 3 was incorporated into a provincial road, leaving Lot 2, measuring 1,839 square meters.
  • A portion of Lot 2 (50.01 square meters) was used for road widening, leaving 1,788.99 square meters owned by the respondents.
  • The remaining portion was allocated to Candido, Demetila, and the heirs of Danilo through a signed Kasulatan.
  • The owner’s duplicate of TCT No. T-141671 was destroyed in a flood in 1978, and the original was lost in a fire in 1987.
  • Candido filed a petition with the RTC of Malolos for the reconstitution of TCT No. T-141671 and issuance of a new owner’s duplicate.
  • The RTC granted the petition on January 21, 2003, but the Republic appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA).
  • On August 17, 2005, the CA ruled the evidence insufficient for reconstitution but upheld the issuance of a new owner’s duplicate.
  • The Republic's motion for partial reconsideration was denied on November 16, 2005, leading to a petition for review on certiorari.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted the petition, ruling that the Court of Appeals erred in maintaining the order for the issuance of a new owner’s duplicate title after deleting the reconstitution ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that reconstitution aims to restore the original form and condition of a lost or destroyed title.
  • The original document must be replaced with a new one upon reconstitution, as mandated by Section 16 of...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.