Title
Republic vs. Santua
Case
G.R. No. 155703
Decision Date
Sep 8, 2008
The Supreme Court denies a petition for reconstitution of a destroyed title, emphasizing the need for clear proof and valid sources in reconstitution proceedings.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 155703)

Facts:

  • On February 16, 1999, Dominador Santua filed a petition for judicial reconstitution of Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. T-22868 with the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Calapan, Oriental Mindoro.
  • Santua claimed ownership of parcels of land totaling 3,306 square meters located in Poblacion, Victoria, Oriental Mindoro, covered by TCT No. T-22868.
  • The original copy of the title was destroyed in a fire on August 12, 1977, which razed the Capitol Building housing the Office of the Register of Deeds of Oriental Mindoro.
  • The owner's duplicate copy was lost during an earthquake on November 15, 1994.
  • Santua asserted that there were no co-owner's, mortgagee's, or lessee's duplicate copies, no buildings or improvements on the land that did not belong to him, and no deeds or instruments affecting the property pending registration.
  • He and his family were in actual possession of the property and had been paying taxes on it.
  • The petition included a tax declaration, survey plan, and technical descriptions of the lots.
  • The RTC issued an order for the initial hearing and directed the publication and notification of the order.
  • Santua complied with the jurisdictional requirements and presented various documents, including the tax declaration, technical descriptions, and a certification from the Acting Register of Deeds.
  • The RTC granted the petition on December 15, 2000, directing the reconstitution of the title.
  • The Office of the Solicitor General appealed, and the Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC decision on September 23, 2002.
  • The Republic of the Philippines then filed a petition for review with the Supreme Court.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted the petition, reversed and set aside the CA decision, and denied ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized that the reconstitution of a certificate of title involves restoring a lost or destroyed instrument attesting to a person's title to a piece of land.
  • This process must be based on clear proof that the title was indeed issued to the petitioner.
  • Section 3 of Republic Act (R.A.) No. 26 enumerates the valid and sufficient bases for reconstitution, which include the owner's duplicate, co-owner's, mortgagee's, or lessee's duplicate, a certified copy of the certificate of title, the deed of transfer or other document on file in the registry of deeds, and any other document deemed sufficient by the court.
  • The Court noted that the documents enumerated in Section 3 are highly credible as they ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.