Title
Re: Erlinda Ilusorio-Bildner
Case
A.M. No. 07-11-14-SC
Decision Date
Apr 14, 2015
A lawyer was found guilty of indirect contempt for withholding information in a fraud investigation, while another individual was exonerated due to insufficient evidence of her knowledge and involvement.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.M. No. 07-11-14-SC)

Facts:

  • Erlinda Ilusorio-Bildner sent a letter to Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno on October 10, 2007, alleging irregularities in Philcomsat Holdings Corporation (PHC).
  • Bildner claimed that accounting entries indicated disbursements made for representation in favor of the Supreme Court, suggesting potential administrative action against certain judges and lawyers.
  • The Supreme Court, in a Resolution dated July 22, 2008, noted that Bildner "failed to make a case" regarding her allegations of favorable judicial decisions in exchange for disbursements.
  • The court expressed concern over the lack of candor from Atty. Luis K. Lokin, Jr. and Desideria Casas, who were invited to provide information.
  • An investigation revealed two significant amounts: P206,000.00 and P2 million, allegedly linked to representation for the Supreme Court.
  • Senator Juan Ponce Enrile, in a privilege speech on January 29, 2008, alleged that PHC had been plundered, with funds funneled to various government agencies, including the Supreme Court.
  • The Investigating Committee found insufficient evidence to hold any judiciary member liable but recommended action against Lokin and Casas for their lack of candor.
  • The court found Lokin guilty of lying about a check for P2 million, while Casas was deemed less culpable.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court ruled that Bildner failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate her allegations against members of the judiciary.
  • Atty. Luis K. Lokin, Jr. was found guilty of indirect contempt for willfully withholding information, while Desideria Casas was absolved of liability.
  • Atty. Lokin was ordered to pay a fine o...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of maintaining judicial integrity and the necessity for individuals involved in judicial proceedings to act with ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.