Title
Re: People vs Enrique Trespeces
Case
A.M. No. 15-09-102-MTCC
Decision Date
Jun 26, 2019
Charges against the utility worker for berating and threatening the security officer were dismissed for lack of evidence, but the worker was reprimanded for not adhering to scheduled hours.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.M. No. 15-09-102-MTCC)

Facts:

  • The case involves an incident on February 25, 2015, between Security Officer Marlino G. Agbayani and Utility Worker I Mr. Marion M. Durban at the Municipal Trial Court in Iloilo City.
  • Agbayani reported the incident in an Incident Report dated February 26, 2015, to Executive Judge Loida J. Diestro-Maputol.
  • Agbayani claimed that while checking an overheated fluorescent light, Durban confronted him, shouted, threatened, and berated him in front of witnesses.
  • Executive Judge Diestro-Maputol ordered an investigation, which was conducted by Executive Judge Enrique Z. Trespeces.
  • Witness testimonies varied; some supported Agbayani, while others downplayed the incident.
  • Judge Trespeces found Durban guilty of conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service and recommended a nine-month suspension.
  • The Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) later found insufficient evidence to support the charges and recommended dismissal, advising a warning for future conduct.
  • The case was escalated to the Supreme Court for final resolution.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the charges of conduct prejudicial to the best interest of the service against Mr. Durban.
  • The Court also dismissed the allegations of loafing due to lack of evidence.
  • Mr. Durban was admonished for not strictly observing ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court determined that the evidence did not sufficiently prove that Durban had berated or threatened Agbayani.
  • Witness testimonies were inconsistent, with some indicating the interaction was a loud conversation rather than an altercation.
  • The Court noted that Durban's loud voice may have been misinterpreted as aggression.
  • The OCA's findings were upheld, emphasizin...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.