Title
Re: Alberto Salamat
Case
A.M. No. P-08-2494
Decision Date
Nov 27, 2008
Sheriff IV Alberto Salamat is found guilty of punching in the time cards of his co-employees, resulting in a ten-month suspension and a warning for future misconduct.
Font Size

Case Digest (A.M. No. P-08-2494)

Facts:

  • The case involves an administrative charge against Sheriff IV Alberto Salamat of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Malolos City, Branch 80, in the Philippines.
  • Salamat is accused of punching in the daily time cards for his co-employees, which is a violation of the rules and regulations governing the submission of time records in the judiciary.
  • The incident occurred on April 22, 2005, when a security guard witnessed Salamat punching in more than five daily time cards.
  • The security guard reminded Salamat about the prohibition on punching in multiple time cards, but Salamat persisted in doing so.
  • The incident was reported to the superiors at Black Tiger Security Services, Inc., the company providing security services to the Halls of Justice.
  • An investigation was conducted and it was found that Salamat had indeed punched in the time cards of his co-employees.
  • There was an error in the date stated in the letter-report charging Salamat, but a subsequent investigation confirmed that the incident did occur on April 22, 2005.
  • Salamat denied the allegations and claimed that the records were doctored, but failed to provide any evidence to support his claims.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • Sheriff IV Alberto Salamat is guilty of dishonesty for punching in the time cards of his co-employees.
  • Salamat is suspended for ten months.
  • A warning is given that a r...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Court agreed with the findings of the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) that Salamat is guilty of dishonesty.
  • The Court emphasized the importance of honesty and integrity in the judiciary and stated that every employee should be an example of integrity, uprightness, and honesty.
  • The Court considered mitigating circumstances, such as Salamat's acknowledgment of his infractions, his remorse, a...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.