Case Digest (G.R. No. 171565)
Facts:
- Petitioner Antonio B. Ramos challenges the dismissal of a criminal case for falsification of commercial documents.
- Petitioner claims conspiracy and alteration of stock certificates by respondents Emerito M. Ramos, Sr. and Rogerio H. Escobal.
- Petitioner filed criminal charges against respondents for falsification of commercial documents.
- Investigating Prosecutor found probable cause and recommended filing of criminal charges.
- Four separate Informations were filed charging respondents with falsification of commercial documents.
- Ramos, Sr. passed away and motion to dismiss cases against him was filed.
- Arraignment of Escobal was deferred due to pending Motion for Reconsideration.
- Office of the City Prosecutor granted the Motion for Reconsideration and recommended withdrawal of Informations against both accused.
- MeTC dismissed the criminal cases based on the recommendation of the City Prosecutor.
- MeTC ruled that the alterations made by the accused did not constitute falsification of commercial documents.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the criminal case for falsification of commercial documents.
- The trial court had the authority to grant the motion to withdraw the Informations based on its assessment of the evidence.
- The petition...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The trial court has the authority to grant the motion to withdraw the Informations based on its assessment of the evidence. This is within the court's discretion and is in line with the principle of judicial independence.
- The alterations made by the accused di...continue reading
Case Digest (G.R. No. 171565)
Facts:
The case involves a criminal complaint for falsification of commercial documents filed by Antonio B. Ramos against Emerito M. Ramos, Sr. and Rogerio H. Escobal. Ramos claimed that he was the lawful assignee of certain stock certificates, but the respondents conspired and altered the certificates to make it appear that the assignee was E.M. Ramos & Sons, Inc. instead of Antonio B. Ramos. They also changed the date of endorsement to January 19, 1998, when it was actually endorsed in August 1994. The investigating prosecutor found probable cause and recommended the filing of criminal charges. Four separate Informations were filed against the respondents. However, before the arraignment, Ramos, Sr. passed away and a motion to dismiss the cases against him was filed. The arraignment of Escobal was deferred due to a pending motion for reconsideration of the resolution recommending the filing of the cases. The motion for reconsideration was granted, and the Office of the City Prosecutor recommended the withdrawal of the Informations against bo...