Facts:

• The case involves two consolidated appeals: G.R. No. 32296 (Mateo Ramiro and Juana Villanueva vs. Clemencia Grano and others) and G.R. No. 32331 (Estanislao Reyes vs. Clemencia Grano and Jose Martinez).
• The events occurred in San Lorenzo, San Pablo, Laguna, with a decision rendered on March 31, 1930.
• The disputes revolve around four parcels of land (parcels A, B, C, and realty No. 1) with overlapping claims.
• The Court of First Instance of Laguna adjudicated the cases jointly, ruling that Estanislao Reyes was the rightful owner based on a valid auction purchase.
• The court ordered defendants and intervenors to refrain from disturbing Reyes's possession.
• The appellants contested the ruling, asserting ownership through prior transactions and alleging errors in the lower court's judgment.

Issue:

• (Unlock)

Ruling:

• The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's decision, confirming Estanislao Reyes as the rightful owner of the disputed parcels.
• The court found no merit in the ownership claims made by the ap...(Unlock)

Ratio:

• The Supreme Court's ruling was based on the principle of res judicata, as established in the prior case of Martinez vs. Grano, which confirmed Reyes's ownership through a public auction.
• The court noted that the appellants failed to provide adequate evidence to support their claims, and ownership had already been adjudicated in favor of Reyes.
• The appellants' predeces...continue reading