Title
Purisima vs. Solis
Case
G.R. No. L-27172
Decision Date
Jan 31, 1972
The Supreme Court dismissed the election contest for the Provincial Board Member position in Ilocos Sur as moot and academic due to the term's expiration and the petitioner's acceptance of a judicial role.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. L-27172)

Facts:

  • The case involves Provincial Fiscal Natalio P. Amarga and Assistant Provincial Fiscal Floriano Alo Beltran as petitioners against Judge Cipriano Vamenta, Jr. and Angel V. Campoy as respondents.
  • On June 3, 1959, Angel Campoy executed a "Deed of Extrajudicial Settlement and Sale" for a parcel of land in barrio Looc, Sibulan, Negros Oriental.
  • The deed aimed to settle ownership among the heirs of the late Macaria Grifo and included a transfer of ownership to Campoy and his wife.
  • The deed was contested, leading to three legal actions against Campoy:
    • The first action was a civil case (3907) filed on May 31, 1961, accusing Campoy of fraud for omitting legitimate heir Esperanza Abol from the deed.
    • The second action was an administrative case filed in March 1961 against Campoy, then a City Judge, for falsifying the deed.
    • The third action was a criminal case (7894) filed on February 15, 1966, for the same falsification charge.
  • Judge Cipriano Vamenta, Jr. was assigned to the criminal case.
  • Campoy requested a suspension of the criminal case hearing, which was granted, leading to a delay until the civil case was resolved.
  • The provincial fiscal filed a petition for certiorari and mandamus with the Supreme Court to compel the judge to proceed with the criminal case.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the petition filed by the provincial fiscal, allowing criminal case 7894 to proceed without further delay.
  • The Court found that any action on the petitioner's request would ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court reasoned that the issues raised in the petition were not moot and academic, despite developments during the case's pendency.
  • The Court noted that the respondent...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.