Title
Pundaodaya vs. Commission on Elections
Case
G.R. No. 179313
Decision Date
Sep 17, 2009
The petition for certiorari contests the COMELEC En Banc's ruling permitting an unqualified mayoral candidate to run, leading to his disqualification and the vice-mayor's succession.
Font Size

Case Digest (G.R. No. 179313)

Facts:

  • The case involves Makil U. Pundaodaya (petitioner) and the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) along with Arsenio Densing Noble (respondent).
  • Noble filed his Certificate of Candidacy on March 27, 2007, claiming 15 years of residency in Purok 3, Barangay Esperanza, Kinoguitan, Misamis Oriental.
  • Pundaodaya, whose wife Judith was also a candidate for mayor, filed a disqualification petition against Noble on April 3, 2007, arguing that Noble was actually a resident of Lapasan, Cagayan de Oro City, where he ran a business.
  • Noble asserted he was a registered voter in Kinoguitan and had participated in elections there since 1998.
  • On May 13, 2007, COMELEC's Second Division disqualified Noble for failing to prove actual residency.
  • Despite the disqualification, Noble won the election on May 15, 2007.
  • The COMELEC En Banc reversed the disqualification on August 3, 2007, declaring Noble qualified based on his marriage ties and voter registration.
  • Pundaodaya filed a petition for certiorari, claiming COMELEC acted with grave abuse of discretion.

Issue:

  • (Unlock)

Ruling:

  • The Supreme Court granted Pundaodaya's petition, reversing the August 3, 2007, resolution of the COMELEC En Banc that declared Noble qualified.
  • The Court found Noble disqualified due to insufficient evidence of residency.
  • The Court ruled there was no basis for proclaiming Judith ...(Unlock)

Ratio:

  • The Supreme Court's decision focused on the interpretation of residency requirements under Section 39 of Republic Act No. 7160, the Local Government Code.
  • The Court clarified that residency involves the intention to establish a permanent home, not just physical presence.
  • Previous rulings indicated that voting does not conclusively establish residency.
  • Noble's claims of residency were weakened by evidence ...continue reading

Jur is an AI-powered legal research platform in the Philippines for case digests, summaries, and jurisprudence. AI-generated content may contain inaccuracies; please verify independently.

© 2024 Jur.ph. All rights reserved.