Case Digest (G. R. No. 39694)
Facts:
- The case G.R. No. 39694 involves Pulp and Paper Trading Company (plaintiff/appellee) and Loko (Tan Ko), doing business as Tan Ko & Co. (defendant/appellant).
- The events occurred in Manila, where the plaintiff filed a complaint for recovery of amounts owed by the defendant.
- On February 9, 1933, the Court of First Instance of Manila issued an order, which the defendant appealed.
- The plaintiff claimed the defendant owed two amounts:
- $1,378.90 with legal interest from September 23, 1931.
- $1,505.60 with legal interest from November 26, 1931.
- The case was submitted for decision after both parties presented their arguments, and the court's decision was filed on April 28, 1934.
- The court reversed the lower court's order, ruling in favor of the plaintiff and ordering the defendant to pay the specified amounts and costs.
Issue:
- (Unlock)
Ruling:
- The Supreme Court of the Philippines ruled in favor of the plaintiff, reversing the lower court's decision.
- The defendant was ordered to pay:
- $1,378.90 with legal interest from September 23, 1931.
- $1,505.60 with legal interest from November 26, 1931.
- Payments were to be made...(Unlock)
Ratio:
- The Supreme Court's decision was based on the evaluation of evidence and legal obligations between the parties.
- The court found the plaintiff's claims were substantiated, while the defendant failed to justify non-payment.
- The ruling emphasized the importance of upholdin...continue reading
Case Digest (G. R. No. 39694)
Facts:
The case G.R. No. 39694 involves the Pulp and Paper Trading Company as the plaintiff and appellee, and Loko, also known as Tan Ko, doing business under the name of Tan Ko & Co., as the defendant and appellant. The events leading to this case transpired in Manila, where the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant for the recovery of certain amounts due. The lower court, specifically the Court of First Instance of Manila, issued an order on February 9, 1933, which the defendant subsequently appealed. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant owed them two separate amounts: $1,378.90, which had accrued legal interest from September 23, 1931, and $1,505.60, which had accrued legal interest from November 26, 1931. The case was submitted for decision after both parties presented their arguments, and the court's decision was filed on April 28, 1934. The court ultimately reversed the lower court's order and ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the specified amounts along with the costs incurred.
Issue:
- Did the Cour...